Table 3.
Accuracy 1 of prediction of seven linear methods in seven training scenarios for line B2
Training dataset | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | B1 | B2 | W1 | B1 + B2 | B1 + W1 | B2 + W1 | B1 + B2 + W1 |
BLUP2 | - | 0.220 | - | - | - | - | - |
GBLUP_VR | 0.123 | 0.301 | 0.123 | 0.303 | 0.173 | 0.332 | 0.343 |
GBLUP_%id | 0.147 | 0.329 | 0.136 | 0.336 | 0.198 | 0.352 | 0.376 |
RRBLUP | 0.129 | 0.359 | 0.142 | 0.373 | 0.176 | 0.369 | 0.390 |
RRPCA | 0.143 | 0.448 | 0.109 | 0.476 | 0.185 | 0.463 | 0.494 |
BSSVS | 0.118 | 0.316 | 0.112 | 0.327 | 0.150 | 0.346 | 0.356 |
BayesC | 0.111 | 0.338 | 0.106 | 0.318 | 0.139 | 0.354 | 0.357 |
BLUP: conventional BLUP using a pedigree based relationship matrix; G-BLUP: Genome-enabled Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP); RRBLUP: Ridge Regression BLUP; RRPCA: Ridge Regression with PCA reduction; BayesSSVS: Bayesian Stochastic Search Variable Selection; BayesC; 1approximated SE of the accuracies of the genomic prediction models ranged from 0.097-0.102; 2for BLUP, only the analysis including the line itself was performed, because there are no pedigree relations between lines.