Table 1. Frequencies of maintenance of leisure-time physical activity and association with dimensions of social support. Estudo Pró-Saúde,a Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Southeastern Brazil, 1999-2001.
Social support (tertiles) | Maintenance of leisure-time physical activity |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women |
Men |
|||||||||||
n | % | Unadjusted OR | 95%CI | Fully-adjusted OR | 95%CIb | n | % | Unadjusted OR | 95%CI | Fully-adjusted OR | 95%CIb | |
Material | ||||||||||||
Lower | 192 | 52 | 1 | 1 | 157 | 60 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Intermediate | 248 | 77 | 1.33 | 0.9;1.9 | 1.21 | 0.7;1.9 | 239 | 64 | 1.07 | 0.7;1.6 | 1.31 | 0.8;2.2 |
Upper | 195 | 52 | 1.01 | 0.7;1.5 | 0.81 | 0.5;1.3 | 243 | 61 | 1.00 | 0.7;1.5 | 1.09 | 0.6;1.9 |
Affective | ||||||||||||
Lower | 192 | 52 | 1 | 1 | 179 | 60 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Intermediate | 127 | 34 | 0.81 | 0.5;1.3 | 0.66 | 0.4;1.1 | 122 | 59 | 1.16 | 0.7;1.9 | 1.24 | 0.7;2.2 |
Upper | 316 | 85 | 1.30 | 0.9;1.9 | 1.32 | 0.8;2.7 | 342 | 64 | 1.08 | 0.7;1.6 | 1.05 | 0.7;1.7 |
Emotional/ Information | ||||||||||||
Lower | 169 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 192 | 58 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Intermediate | 142 | 47 | 1.57 | 1.0;2.3 | 1.66 | 1.0;1.8 | 228 | 65 | 1.24 | 0.8;1.9 | 1.15 | 0.7;1.9 |
Upper | 220 | 59 | 1.42 | 0.9;2.1 | 1.26 | 0.9;2.0 | 217 | 62 | 1.04 | 0.9;1.6 | 0.87 | 0.5;1.4 |
Positive social interaction | ||||||||||||
Lower | 186 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 161 | 59 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Intermediate | 195 | 52 | 0.83 | 0.9;2.1 | 1.11 | 0.7;1.8 | 188 | 60 | 1.01 | 0.8;1.2 | 1.25 | 0.7;2.1 |
Upper | 255 | 69 | 1.07 | 0.9;2.1 | 1.21 | 0.7;1.9 | 291 | 65 | 1.28 | 1.0;1.4 | 1.09 | 0.7;1.8 |
Note: Unadjusted and fully-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for the logistic regression models fitted using social support dimensions as the predictors of maintenance of leisure-time physical activity (reference group: individuals who were active in phase 1, but not in phase 2) (2-year follow-up).
n(%) = Number of observations and percentages of individuals physically active during their leisure time, according to each level of social support dimensions.
All statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) are in bold.
a Faerstein E et al7 (2005).
b Fully adjusted models: adjusted by age, education, per capita monthly income, tobacco and alcohol use, and morbidity.