Table 4. Relative Ability of Historical Hospital Rankings Based on Different Quality Measures, to Forecast Future Risk-Adjusted Mortality, for All Hospitals.
Adjusted Odds Ratio for Risk-Adjusted Mortalilty in 2009 (July-December), 1-Star (bottom 20%) versus 3-Star (top 20%) based on July 2005 to June 2008 Hospita l Rankings (95% CI) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condition | Hospital Volume | Hospital Compare Process Measures | Risk-Adjusted Mortality | Hospital Compare Mortality Measures | Composite Measure |
HF | 1.19 | 1.01 | 1.42 | 1.38 | 1.47 |
(1.14-1.25) | (0.97-1.06) | (1.35-1.48) | (1.31-1.44) | (1.41-1.54) | |
AMI | 1.38 | 1.10 | 1.45 | 1.39 | 1.61 |
(1.31-1.47) | (1.08-1.12) | (1.37-1.54) | (1.31-1.48) | (1.52-1.71) | |
PNA | 1.17 | 1.06 | 1.48 | 1.42 | 1.54 |
(1.12-1.23) | (1.01-1.11) | (1.41-1.55) | (1.35-1.49) | (1.46-1.61) |
Abbreviations: CI is confidence interval, HF is heart failure, AMI is acute myocardial infarction, and PNA is pneumonia.
Note: P-value for difference (between odds ratio for composite measure and odds ratio for individual measures) is <0.05 for all comparisons.