Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2013 Sep;51(9):832–837. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829fa92a

Table 4. Relative Ability of Historical Hospital Rankings Based on Different Quality Measures, to Forecast Future Risk-Adjusted Mortality, for All Hospitals.

Adjusted Odds Ratio for Risk-Adjusted Mortalilty in 2009 (July-December), 1-Star (bottom 20%) versus 3-Star (top 20%) based on July 2005 to June 2008 Hospita l Rankings (95% CI)
Condition Hospital Volume Hospital Compare Process Measures Risk-Adjusted Mortality Hospital Compare Mortality Measures Composite Measure
HF 1.19 1.01 1.42 1.38 1.47
(1.14-1.25) (0.97-1.06) (1.35-1.48) (1.31-1.44) (1.41-1.54)
AMI 1.38 1.10 1.45 1.39 1.61
(1.31-1.47) (1.08-1.12) (1.37-1.54) (1.31-1.48) (1.52-1.71)
PNA 1.17 1.06 1.48 1.42 1.54
(1.12-1.23) (1.01-1.11) (1.41-1.55) (1.35-1.49) (1.46-1.61)

Abbreviations: CI is confidence interval, HF is heart failure, AMI is acute myocardial infarction, and PNA is pneumonia.

Note: P-value for difference (between odds ratio for composite measure and odds ratio for individual measures) is <0.05 for all comparisons.