Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Isr J Chem. 2013 Jun;53(6-7):469–483. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201300009

Table 2.

Comparison of excited-state lifetime values of native and alternative nucleobases in aqueous solution.[a]

Nucleobase Excited-state lifetimes (τ, ps) Reference
Uncharged bases (neutral pH 6.8–7.3)
Hypoxathine 0.13 ± 0.3 [29]
Adenine 0.18 ± 0.3 [34]
Guanine(as Guanosine) 0.16[b] [35]
Xanthine 0.28–0.50[c] [29]
Cytosine 1.0 ± 0.2, 2.9, 12 [36]
Uracil 1.9 ± 0.1, 24 ± 0.2 [36b]
Thymine 2.8 ± 0.1, 30 ± 13 [36b]
5-Methylcytosine 7.2 ± 0.4 [36a]
N4-Acetylcytosine 280 ± 30 [36a]
2,4-Diaminopyrimidine 10–1000[a] (gas) [37]
5-Hydroxyuracil 1800[a] [38]
2,6-Diaminopurine 6300 ± 400[a] (gas) [37]
2-Aminopurine 11800 [39]
Cation charged bases (pH 0–2) via protonatation
Guanine 191 ± 4[b] [40]
Hypoxanthine <0.2 [35]
5-Methylcytosine 2.57 ± 0.22 [36a]
Anion charged bases (pH 13)
Hypoxanthine (pH 10) 19 [35]
Cytosine 13.3 ± 0.4 [36a]
5-Methylcytosine 250 ± 30 [36a]
[a]

Gas-phase experimental studies.

[b]

Due to solubility problems with guanine, the community has relied on the value obtained from deoxyguanosine and guanosine to model/approximate nucleobase values.

[c]

Expected value range based on the derivatives used in the study.