Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 2;8(3):317–328. doi: 10.1111/irv.12227

Table A3.

Regression coefficient and relative risks (hierarchical model) from the sensitivity analysis of prior distributions

Variable Main priors* Alternative priors**


Regression coefficient*** 95% Credible interval Regression coefficient*** 95% Credible interval
Capacity (exponent) 1·098 1·09, 1·10 1·098 1·09, 1·11
Travel time (exponent) 4·13 4·12, 4·14 4·13 4·12, 4·14
CT variable Relative risk***, 95% Credible interval Relative risk***, 95% Credible interval
New immigrant 0·936 0·913, 0·959 0·938 0·915, 0·961
Poverty 0·918 0·893, 0·946 0·917 0·891, 0·943
Official languages 1·034 1·012, 1·059 1·035 1·012, 1·058
MVC variable Relative risk***, 95% Credible interval Relative risk***, 95% Credible interval
Material deprivation 0·649 0·645, 0·654 0·649 0·645, 0·654
Violent crime rate 0·917 0·915, 0·918 0·917 0·915, 0·918
Residential density 0·663 0·660, 0·666 0·663 0·660, 0·666
*

Main priors: intercept: non-informative; regression coefficients N(0, 1000); inverse variances gamma(0·1, 0·0001).

**

Alternative priors: intercept: non-informative; regression coefficients N(0, 10); inverse variances gamma(0·01, 0·0001).

***

Hierarchical model adjusting for driving time, clinic capacity, proportion age ≤4 years, proportion of males and unmeasured CT variables (CT random effects).

Relative risks compare vaccination rates at the upper to vaccination rates at the lower quartile of the CT/MVC variable (Tables 12).