Table 4.
Power (P-) and detection percentage (DP-) of non-DSLs by method; P-1 and DP-1 for first simulation, P-2 and DP-2 for second simulation
| Sample Size | Test | P-1 | P-2 | DP-1 | DP-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500/500 | Armitage Trend | 87.61% | 84.52% | 7.04% | 8.00% |
| 500/500 | Fisher Exact | 85.51% | 84.54% | 5.59% | 7.93% |
| 500/500 | LD, δ=0.001 | 89.96% | 93.64% | 2.39% | 6.00% |
| 500/500 | LD, δ=0.005 | 90.76% | 91.00% | 2.63% | 6.00% |
| 500/500 | LD, δ=0.01 | 91.60% | 72.82% | 2.71% | 5.11% |
| 2500/2500 | Armitage Trend | 100.00% | 100.00% | 18.31% | 11.00% |
| 2500/2500 | Fisher Exact | 100.00% | 100.00% | 17.48% | 10.54% |
| 2500/2500 | LD, δ=0.001 | 100.00% | 100.00% | 3.91% | 8.74% |
| 2500/2500 | LD, δ=0.005 | 100.00% | 100.00% | 4.26% | 8.62% |
| 2500/2500 | LD, δ=0.01 | 100.00% | 77.90% | 4.33% | 8.24% |