Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Card Fail. 2008 Apr;14(3):245–253. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.10.024

Table I.

Hemodynamic Data

Sham MI TAC

Placebo (N=10) E2 (N=8) Placebo (N=21) E2 (N=21) Placebo (N=20) E2 (N=18)
Infarct Size (%) 28.4±1.5 31.3±1.6
HR (bpm) 529±14 530±19 507±11 564±6* 554±10 580±6
LVSP (mmHg) 94.6±2.2 95.0±3.1 89.0±1.4 84.9±2.1 149±2 144±3
Gradient (mmHg) 4.4±2.1 4.0±4.0 - - 64.2±3.1 55.1±6.5
LVEDP (mmHg) 3.1±1.0 2.7±1.4 7.3±0.8 9.3±1.3 11.8±1.4 12.4±1.5
+dP/dt (mmHg s−1) 10452±535 9575±315 8378±211 6734±289* 8836±190 8467±213

All data are means±sem. HR=heart rate, LVSP=LV systolic pressure; Gradient refers to systolic pressure drop across the aortic stricture in TAC animals. LVEDP=LV end diastolic pressure; +dP/dt=peak positive dP/dt derived from the first differential of the LV pressure tracing.

*

p<0.05 vs. Placebo-MI,

p<0.05 vs. the respective sham group.

p<0.01 vs. the respective sham and MI group.