Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108725

Table 7. Physiological responses of M. alba planted in the TGR WLFZ during the recovery stage after winter flooding.

Ch a (mg/g Fw) Ch b (mg/g Fw) Carotenoids (mg/g Fw) A gs Ci E Fv/Fm Yield Y(NPQ) Y(NO) qN
Control 2.08±0.058 0.63±0.021 0.49±0.015 11.90±1.021 0.67±0.082 357±15 2.81±0.530 0.70±0.010 0.68±0.005 0.02±0.007 0.30±0.011 0.09±0.032
Flooding-recovery 2.41±0.015 0.81±0.003 0.55±0.002 14.80±2.401 1.50±0.162 355±8 5.38±0.280 0.71±0.014 0.67±0.008 0.02±0.007 0.31±0.014 0.09±0.030
P>Ff 0.005 0.001 0.017 0.029 0.010 0.881 0.013 0.488 0.406 0.925 0.673 0.954

Ch a, chlorophyll a; Ch b, chlorophyll b; A, net photosynthetic rate; gs, stomatal conductance; Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; E, transpiration rate. Values are means ± SE (n = 6). The values followed by different letters significantly differed at P<0.05 according to Duncan's test. P>Ff indicate comparisons between treatments; Ff, effect of flooding stress.