Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 25;122(10):1028–1039. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307893

Table 4.

Summary of study characteristics evaluating developmental exposure to PFOA and fetal growth in human observational studies.

Source Fetal growth measuresa Births (n) Location Study period Sample matrix Measurement timing Median PFOA (ng/mL) Reason for omission from meta-analysis
Studies included in meta-analyses
Apelberg et al. 2007 BW, L, HC, PI 293 Baltimore, MD (USA) 2004–2005 Cord serum Birth 1.6 NA
Chen et al. 2012 BW, L, HC, PI 429 Taipei, Taiwan 2004 Cord serum Birth 1.7 NA
Fei et al. 2007b BW 1,400 Denmark 1996–2003 Maternal plasma 1st trimester 5.2 NA
Fei et al. 2008b L, HC, PI,c ACd 1,400 Denmark 1996–2003 Maternal plasma 1st trimester 5.2 NA
Fromme et al. 2010 BW 33 Munich, Germany 2007–2008 Cord serum Birth 1.4 NA
Hamm et al. 2009 BW, SGAd 252 Edmonton, Canada 2005–2006 Maternal serum 15–16 weeks 1.5 NA
Kim S et al. 2011 BW 43 South Korea 2008–2009 Cord serum Birth 1.2 NA
Maisonet et al. 2012 BW, L, PI 422 Great Britain 1991–1992 Maternal serum 15 weeks (median) 3.7 NA
Washino et al. 2009 BW, L, HC, PI, CCd 428 Sapporo, Japan 2002–2005 Maternal serum 23–35 weeks 1.3 NA
Whitworth et al. 2012 BW, SGA,d LGAd 849 Norway 2003–2004 Maternal plasma 17 weeks to term 2.2 NA
Studies excluded from meta-analysis
Arbuckle et al. 2012 BW 100 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2005–2008 Cord serum Birth 1.6 BW is not the dependent model variablee
Halldorsson et al. 2012 BW 665 Aarhus, Denmark 1988–1989 Maternal serum 30 weeks 3.7 Only mean BW per PFOA quartile given
Kim SK et al. 2011 BW 17 Seoul, Korea 2007 Cord serum Birth 1.1 Only PFOA–BW correlation given
Monroy et al. 2008 BW 101 Ontario, Canada 2004–2005 Cord serum Birth 1.6 BW is not the dependent model variablee
Nolan et al. 2009 BW 1,555 Ohio (USA) 2002–2005 Water service area Preconception or during pregnancy NA Categorical ecological exposuref
Savitz et al. 2012a BW 10,189 Ohio and West Virginia (USA) 1990–2006 Retrospectively modeled maternal serum During pregnancy 6–15.9 High risk of bias for exposure assessment; only dichotomous outcome of low BWf
Savitz et al. 2012b (study I) BW 8,253 Ohio and West Virginia (USA) 1990–2004 Retrospectively modeled maternal serum During pregnancy 7.7 High risk of bias for exposure assessment; (included estimate from Study II in sensitivity meta-analysis)f
Savitz et al. 2012b (study II) BW 4,547 Ohio and West Virginia (USA) 1990–2004 Retrospectively modeled maternal serum During pregnancy 7.2–18.3 High risk of bias for exposure assessment; (Included in sensitivity meta-analysis)f
Stein et al. 2009 BW 1,589 Ohio and West Virginia (USA) 2000–2006 Maternal serum Up to 5 years postnatal 21.2 Only dichotomous outcome of low BWf
Abbreviations: AC, abdominal circumference; BW, birth weight; CC, chest circumference; HC, head circumference; L, length; LGA, large for gestational age; NA, not applicable; PI, ponderal index; SGA, small for gestational age. aAll fetal growth measures at birth. bFei et al. (2007) and Fei et al. (2008) are studies of the same population. cBecause the analysis of PI was stratified, it was not combined in the meta-analysis of PI. dOnly two studies measured SGA, and only one study each measured AC, CC or LGA; no meta-analysis was conducted for these measures. eSerum PFOA was the outcome variable estimated in the model. fBecause the studies of Nolan et al. (2009), Savitz et al. (2012a, 2012b), and Stein et al. (2009) were conducted in the same geographical area, participants may overlap; therefore, we did not consider these studies for simultaneous inclusion in meta-analysis.