Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 13;122(10):1059–1065. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408198

Table 2.

Association between arsenic exposure and diabetes among 52,931 DCH cohort participants for two definitions of diabetes incidence based on the NDR.

Diabetes definition and arsenic exposure (μg/L) Cases (n) IRR (95% CI)
Crudea,b Adjusted modela,b,c
All diabetes
< 0.57 1,049 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
0.57–0.74 1,021 1.09 (1.00, 1.19) 0.96 (0.87, 1.05)
0.74–1.82 1,017 1.06 (0.97, 1.15) 1.08 (0.99, 1.18)
> 1.82 1,217 1.20 (1.10, 1.30) 1.19 (1.09, 1.31)
Linear trend per μg/L 4,304 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)
Strict diabetes
< 0.57 749 1.00 (Referent) 1.00 (Referent)
0.57–0.74 856 1.28 (1.16, 1.41) 1.03 (0.92, 1.14)
0.74–1.82 648 0.94 (0.84, 1.04) 1.00 (0.89, 1.11)
> 1.82 782 1.07 (0.97, 1.19) 0.99 (0.89, 1.11)
Linear trend per μg/L 3,035 1.00 (0.98, 1.03) 1.02 (0.99, 1.05)
aAdjusted for age by using it as the time scale in the Cox model. bBecause cohort members with missing value in any covariate were excluded, the number of persons was identical in the crude and the adjusted analyses. cAdjusted for calendar year, sex, BMI (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), smoking (indicator: never, former, current), ETS (indicator: yes/no), physical sports and activity in leisure time [indicator: yes/no, and intensity (hr/week)], alcohol consumption (indicator: yes/no, and g/day), fruit consumption (g/day), vegetable consumption (g/day), saturated fat consumption (g/day), educational level (indicator: < 8, 8–10, > 10 years), SES (indicator: low, medium low, medium high, and high).