. 2014 Sep 30;12(9):e1001960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960

Table 1. Total Akaike weight (support) for different models of social transmission of moss-sponging (M) and LS re-use (RU1), assuming (a) a static network and (b) a dynamic network.

Social Transmission Model	Total Akaike Weight (Σw_i)
	(a) Static Network	(b) Dynamic Network
1. Asocial learning	1.38×10⁻⁵	1.12×10⁻⁶
2. Same social transmission effect	0.096	0.0002
3. Different social transmission effect	0.397	0.246
4. Social transmission of M only	0.603	0.754
5. Social transmission of RU1 only	1.27×10⁻⁵	6.37×10⁻⁷