Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e107272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107272

Table 4. Subgroup meta-analysis of the association between DAPK1 promoter methylation and cervical cancer.

Group Tumor Control M-H pooled OR D+L pooled OR Heterogeneity
M+ N M+ N OR(95%CI) OR(96%CI) I2(%) P τ2
Total 472 818 178 671 15.32(9.97–23.55) 19.66(8.72–44.31) 60.0 0.002 1.34
Ethnicity
Non-Caucasians 306 499 170 527 17.88(10.29–31.07) 19.82(8.12–48.35) 42.6 0.083 0.70
Caucasians 166 319 8 144 12.27(6.25–24.10) 18.22(3.35–99.03) 75.9 <0.001 3.18
Method
MSP 323 541 170 567 19.10(11.11–32.84) 21.07(8.98–49.43) 40.3 0.089 0.67
QMSP 149 277 8 104 10.46(5.21–21.01) 15.30(2.34–99.66) 78.8 <0.001 3.41
Sample size
A 177 298 160 513 25.80(12.56–53.02) 27.25(10.67–69.58) 29.3 0.195 0.51
B 295 520 18 158 10.70(6.22–18.42) 13.55(3.93–46.73) 69.3 0.003 1.71

Notes: Non-Caucasians included Asians and Africans; A: The case sample size was less than 60; B: The case sample size was larger or equal to 60; M-H: the fixed effects mode; D+L: the random effects model.