Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 10;307(5):G582–G587. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00048.2014

Table 1.

Comparison of gastric volumes measured by manual vs. semiautomated techniques

Measurements Manual Semiautomated CCC (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Difference (manual − semiautomated volume)
Food
    Postprandial 5 352 ± 4 346 ± 4 0.70 (0.52, 0.81) 6.1 (0.1, 12.1)
    Postprandial 10 343 ± 5 336 ± 5 0.79 (0.66–0.87) 7.1 (0.7, 13.5)
    Postprandial 20 328 ± 6 324 ± 5 0.85 (0.75–0.91) 4.4 (−1.7, 10.4)
    Postprandial 30 313 ± 7 309 ± 6 0.88 (0.80–0.93) 5.4 (−1.3, 12.2)
Air
    Postprandial 5 88 ± 6 84 ± 6 0.89 (0.82, 0.94) 4.8 (−0.8, 10.4)
    Postprandial 10 86 ± 6 83 ± 7 0.91 (0.84, 0.94) 2.4 (−3.1, 8.0)
    Postprandial 20 85 ± 6 79 ± 6 0.89 (0.81, 0.93) 5.9 (0.5, 11.3)
    Postprandial 30 81 ± 6 78 ± 6 0.92 (0.86, 0.95) 4.7 (0.2, 9.3)

CCC, concordance correlaton coefficient; CI, confidence interval.

The nos. 5, 10, and 30 reflect imaging time, in min, relative to meal ingestion.