Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr 1;73(2):605–613. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25169

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparing magnitude modulation (a) and g-factor (b) at different slab overlapping factors. The slab thickness used for the simulation was 10 mm. For better visualization, only a section of the FOV in the slab direction was plotted. The slab crosstalk effect was not simulated. A flat signal modulation function in the slab direction is desirable. A flat g-factor function that approximates 1 is also desirable. Therefore, the best overlapping factor is 2 mm.