Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108843

Table 2. Regression Coefficients.

Species estimate SE z67 a Pb
Chaetodipus formosus −1.242 0.817 −1.521 0.128
Neotoma lepida −4.854 4.287 −1.132 0.258
Peromyscus maniculatus −0.786 0.570 −1.379 0.168
Onychomys leucogaster −2.209 2.218 −0.996 0.319
Perognathus parvus 1.821 1.644 1.107 0.268
Dipodomys microps −3.077 1.118 −2.752 0.006*
Dipodomys ordii −0.531 0.925 −0.574 0.566
Ammospermophilus leucurus −4.759 1.942 −2.451 0.014*

Note. – Linear regression coefficients and standard errors (SE) for each species when small-mammal abundance is calculated as a function of the percentage of cheatgrass cover for sites in the Great Basin Desert, Utah (data collected 2011–2012). The asterisk denotes significance at the P<0.05 level.

a

test statistic.

b

p-value.