Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;9(10):e108946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108946

Figure 5. Consequences of disrupting CdnL interaction with RNAP in vivo.

Figure 5

(A) Scheme of the strategy employed to check for cdnL complementation in M. xanthus. A pMR2873 construct with the required cdnL allele (cdnL*) under PcdnL control and DNA segments flanking cdnL upstream (grey) and downstream (black) in the genome, was introduced into strain MR1467, which bears the ΔcdnL allele and a copy of cdnL at a heterologous site under the control of the photoinducible PB promoter (expressed in the light but repressed in the presence of B12 in the dark). Merodiploids resulting from plasmid integration by recombination at either “1” or “2” would constitutively express cdnL* from PcdnL and conditionally express the wild-type allele from PB at a heterologous site. (B) Complementation analyses in M. xanthus with the F36A, M49A and P51A CdnL mutants. CTT/B12 plates that were spotted with 5 µl of liquid cultures (OD550 ∼1) grown under permissive conditions and diluted as indicated, and then incubated for 2 days at 33°C under restrictive (dark and B12) or permissive (light, hence the red color) conditions. “WT” is the positive control derived from using pMR2873 with wild-type cdnL, and “ΔcdnL” is the recipient strain MR1467. Western blots (using polyclonal anti-CdnL antibodies) of M. xanthus cell extracts from strains expressing each CdnL variant and in which CdnL-eGFP supplied the essential CdnL function, as described in the text. (C) BACTH analysis of the interaction of CdnL homologs (BbCdnL, ScCdnL, and CgCdnL) with Bbβ31–538, Scβ29–426, and Cgβ32–428 fragments, respectively. “+” below the open bars indicates that both members of the pair are present, while “−” is the negative control (without the indicated CdnL homolog). We have shown the interaction of TtCdnL with its cognate β-fragment elsewhere [18]. (D) BACTH analysis of the interaction of BbCdnL, ScCdnL, CgCdnL or TtCdnL with M. xanthus Mxβ19–537.