Table 6.
Effect of methanolic extract of C. nurvala leaf on Involvement of ATP-sensitive K + channel pathway
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of writhing (Mean ± SEM) | % Inhibition | ||
| Control | 0.1 ml/mouse | 73.90 ± 1.61 | - |
| Diclofenac sodium | 10 | 19.90 ± 0.53* | 73.07 |
| MECN | 50 | 54.70 ± 1.83* | 25.98 |
| MECN | 100 | 29.90 ± 0.66* | 59.54 |
| MECN | 200 | 18.30 ± 1.25* | 75.24 |
| Glib | 10 | 75.1 ± 2.01 | −1.62 |
| Glib + Diclofenac-sodium | 10 + 10 | 36.20 ± 1.77a | 51.05 |
| Glib + MECN | 10 + 50 | 50.00 ± 1.53 | 32.34 |
| Glib + MECN | 10 + 100 | 28.00 ± 2.13 | 62.11 |
| Glib + MECN | 10 + 200 | 20.00 ± 1.34 | 72.94 |
Each value is presented as the Mean ± SEM (n = 5). MECN = Methanolic extract of. Crataeva nurvala leaves; Glib = Glibenclemide.
*p < 0.001 compared with the control group (Dunnett’s test).
a p < 0.001 compared with the Diclofenac sodium treated group (Bonferroni’s test).