Table 1.
Summary of water point construction and management data
| Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Construction information | ||
| Number constructed pre-earthquake | 3 | 0.8 |
| Number constructed post-earthquake | 374 | 99.2 |
| Total constructed | 377 | 100.0 |
| Constructed and marked by IO/NGO | 213 | 56.5 |
| Constructed with no sign of sponsor | 132 | 35.0 |
| Constructed by community | 13 | 3.4 |
| Privately constructed | 16 | 4.2 |
| Management strategy | ||
| All water sources (N = 377) | ||
| No evidence of management strategy | 284 | 75.3 |
| Evidence of management strategy | 93 | 24.7 |
| Managed by IO/NGO | 44 | 47.3 |
| Managed by community | 21 | 22.6 |
| Managed by elected committee | 12 | 12.9 |
| Managed by individuals | 12 | 12.9 |
| Managed by alternative | 6 | 6.5 |
| Managed by DINEPA | 1 | 1.1 |
| IO/NGO constructed water sources (N = 213) | ||
| No evidence of management strategy | 145 | 68.1 |
| Evidence of management strategy | 68 | 24.9 |
| Managed by same IO/NGO | 41 | 28.3 |
| Managed by other Organization | 27 | 18.6 |