Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2014 Sep 2;76(5):1082–1098. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12139

Table 3.

Fixed Effects Regressions Predicting Children’s Current Grade Level, Children Ages 6–18, Mexican Family Life Survey 1 and 2 and Indonesian Family Life Survey 3 and 4

Predictor Mexico Indonesia
Age 0.57*** 0.43***
(0.04) (0.06)
Age squared −0.01*** −0.01***
(0.00) (0.00)
Parental migration statusa (ref.: Parents not migrants)
 Parents internal migrants −0.15 0.06
(0.10) (0.20)
 Parents international migrants −0.25** −0.19
(0.09) (0.11)
Household human capital (ref.: primary school and no education)
 Junior high education 0.08 0.01
(0.06) (0.10)
 High school education or above 0.07 0.17*
(0.08) (0.09)
Household per capita monthly expenditures (logged) 0.01 0.04
(0.03) (0.02)
Number of children (age 6–18) in household 0.02 −0.00
(0.02) (0.02)
Extended family arrangement 0.17 0.14
(0.23) (0.12)
Rural residence −0.17 −0.05
(0.11) (0.13)
Community average household per capita monthly expenditures (logged) 0.22* 0.07
(0.10) (0.04)
Community proportion of households with children of emigrant parents −0.55* 0.39
(0.28) (0.22)
Intercept 0.23 0.23
(0.55) (0.73)
N (no. children × 2) 11,438 5,876
R2 .58 .66

Note: Numbers in parentheses are standard errors. Year and province variables and interactions are not shown. Other variables, such as gender, are omitted in the fixed effects models. ref. = reference.

a

The cross-country difference of the coefficients of parental migration status is jointly significant at p < .10.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.