Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2014 Dec;18(12):2477–2484. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0765-4

Table 3.

Implementation effectiveness measures for self HIV Testing in Uganda

Secondary outcomes Unsupervised
oral self HIV test
N = 123
Provider supervised
oral self HIV test
N = 123
Proportion
difference (%)
(Exact, 90 % CI)
Total (overall) p value
Sensitivity (n/N,%)
   First time testers 6/6 (100) 7/7 (100) 0 53 (21.5)
   Repeat testers (>12 months) 12/13 (92.3) 6/6 (100) −7.7 (−37.7–38.8) 193 (78.5) 0.6635
Return rate (test validation and exit interview) (N, %) 117 (95.1) 123 (100) −4.9 (−10.5–0.6) 240 (95.8) 0.0382
Help requesteda (N, %) 29 (23.6) 51(41.5) −17.9 (−29.7–5.5) 240 (95.8) 0.1708
Observed performance error rate (N, %) (N/A) 24 (19.5) 123 (50)
Linkage to Careb
  CD4 cell counts (N; median, IQR)
    Total (median, IQR) N = 16; 418 (127–672) N = 9; 551 (387–822) N = 25; 452 (348–810) 0.1374
    Among clients CD4 ≤500 N = 10; 251 (68–410) N = 4; 369 (328–439) N = 14; 349 (101–410) 0.0596
a

At least some form of help found necessary or help actually requested.

b

All 33 HIV positives referred for HIV care and treatment. CD4 Samples derived from 25 consenting participants