Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;96:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.002

Table 6.

Segmentation evaluation metrics. The objects generated as buildings using the SAA tool were used as reference data for evaluating the building objects generated by the ESP2 and SOP tools. Detailed explanations of the segmentation evaluation metrics are provided in Table 2.

No. ref AFI Dij Missing rate No. of misses OSeg Overlap (sq.m.) Qr USeg
Area A SAA vs. ESP2 4115 0.13 0.10 0.016 689 0.14 58,580,625 0.84 0.01
Area A SAA vs. SOP 4115 0.64 0.46 0.63 2600 0.66 23,324,875 0.33 0.05
Area B SAA vs. ESP2 3142 0.02 0.01 0.01 40 0.02 83,696,550 0.97 0.0004
Area B SAA vs. SOP 3142 0.52 0.39 0.53 1693 0.54 38,570,675 0.43 0.062
Area C SAA vs. ESP2 3976 0.09 0.07 0.06 239 0.10 137,576,800 0.88 0.007
Area C SAA vs. SOP 3976 0.53 0.39 0.42 1681 0.55 69,163,825 0.44 0.039