Table 1.
Sample description and bivariate associations between nutritional status and socioeconomic variables in patients treated for oral cancer (n = 133)
Variable | All | Normal | Malnutrition/Risk | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
n (%![]() |
n (%↔) | n (%↔) | ||
All | 133 (100) | 103 (77.4) | 30 (22.6) | |
Sex | 0.138a | |||
Male | 84 (63.2) | 69 (82.1) | 15 (17.9) | |
Female | 49 (36.8) | 34 (69.4) | 15 (30.6) | |
Age (years) | ||||
<55 | 29 (21.8) | 20 (69.0) | 9 (31.0) | |
55–64 | 34 (25.6) | 30 (88.2) | 4 (11.8) | |
65–74 | 36 (27.1) | 33 (91.7) | 3 (8.3) | |
≥75 | 34 (25.6) | 20 (58.8) | 14 (41.2) | |
Mean ± SD | 0.234b | |||
Social classd | 0.110c | |||
I | 7 (5.3) | 6 (85.7) | 1 (14.3) | |
II | 8 (6.0) | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | |
III | 12 (9.0) | 11 (91.7) | 1 (8.3) | |
IV | 32 (24.1) | 25 (78.1) | 7 (21.9) | |
V | 74 (55.6) | 54 (73.0) | 20 (27.0) | |
Tumor site | 0.815a | |||
Tongue | 47 (35.3) | 35 (74.5) | 12 (25.5) | |
Gingiva | 15 (11.3) | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | |
Mouth floor | 15 (11.3) | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | |
Oropharynx | 18 (13.5) | 15 (83.3) | 3 (16.7) | |
Retromolar | 10 (7.5) | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | |
Others | 28 (21.1) | 21 (75.0) | 7 (25.0) | |
Cancer stage | 0.336c | |||
I-II | 81 (60.9) | 65(80.2) | 16 (19.8) | |
III-IV | 52 (39.1) | 38 (73.1) | 14 (26.9) | |
Follow-up (years) | ||||
1-5 | 85 (63.9) | 64 (75.3) | 21 (24.7) | |
6-10 | 32 (24.1) | 27 (84.4) | 5 (15.6) | |
11-15 | 13 (9.8) | 11 (84.6) | 2 (15.4) | |
16-20 | 3 (2.3) | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | |
Mean ± SD | 5.0 ± 4.2 | 5.0 ± 3.9 | 5.0 ± 5.2 | 0.961b |
Functional tooth units | ||||
Anterior (mean ± sd) | 2.3 ± 2.6 | 2.6 ± 2.7 | 1.3 ± 2.3 | 0.020b |
Posterior (mean ± SD) | 2.4 ± 3.6 | 2.8 ± 3.8 | 1.1 ± 2.8 | 0.026b |
Treatment | 0.715c | |||
S | 70 (52.6) | 55 (78.6) | 15 (21.4) | |
S + RT | 39 (29.3) | 30 (76.9) | 9 (23.1) | |
S + RTf + CH | 24 (18.0) | 18 (75.0) | 6 (25.0) |
S surgery, RT radiotherapy, CH chemotherapy
aChi-square test with Yates continuity correction
bStudent’s t test
cMann-Whitney test.
dIn descending order