Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 15;1(2):87–94. doi: 10.1002/sm2.6

Table 3.

Odds ratios estimated by logistic regression analysis in a group of 1,190 Belgian MSM

Comparison of subjects with or without AD

Variable Bivariate analysis (95% CI) Multivariate analysis* (95% CI)


Odds ratio 95% CI P Odds ratio 95% CI P
Age (years) (increasing continuous variable) 0.985 0.975–0.996 0.006 0.872 0.810–0.939 <0.0001
Number of sex partners (increasing continuous variable) 0.877 0.816–0.943 <0.0001
Number of sex partners at the same time (increasing continuous variable) 0.913 0.853–0.976 0.008
Age of first sexual experience with same-sex partner (increasing continuous variable) 1.014 0.995–1.034 NS
Frequency of sex with partner (decreasing variable) 0.874 0.788–0.970 0.011 0.88 0.795–0.978 0.018
Steady relationship (no/yes) 1.304 1.028–1.653 0.029
Use of poppers (no/yes) 1.226 0.962–1.562 NS
Use of condom (no/yes) 1.024 0.890–1.178 NS
Use of lubricant (no/yes) 0.603 0.374–0.972 0.038
Massage of the anal sphincter before anal sex (no/yes) 1.175 1.026–1.345 0.02
*

In the multivariate analysis, both forward and backward stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed, with identical results

MSM = men who have sex with men; AD = anodyspareunia; CI = confidence interval; NS = not significant