Table 3.
Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters after oral administration of 10 mg kg−1 vigabatrin to rats.
| Formulation | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Route of adm. | PO | PO | PO | PO |
| Dietary component | None | Infant formula | Low fat infant formula | Sar |
| AUC0–∞ (h ng mL−1) | 17810 ± 808 | 17699 ± 533 | 16460 ± 267 | 15946 ± 816 |
| tmax (h) | 0.33 [0.25; 0.33] | 0.67 [0.67; 1.00]* | 0.67 [0.58; 0.67]* | 0.67 [0.67; 0.67]* |
| Cmax (ng mL−1) | 13567 ± 953 | 9237 ± 731* | 9087 ± 301* | 9485 ± 738* |
| CL (mL h−1 kg−1) | 567 ± 24 | 568 ± 18 | 608 ± 10 | 635 ± 32 |
| ke (h−1) | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.0 |
| Fabs (%) | 74 ± 3 | 73 ± 2 | 68 ± 1 | 66 ± 3 |
Cmax, AUC0–∞, CL, ke and Fabs are expressed as mean ± SEM, tmax is expressed as the median [Q1; Q3] (25% and 75% percentile) from six rats.
Significant difference from oral administration of vigabatrin 10.0 mg kg−1 (P < 0.05).