Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 3;9(10):e108107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108107

Table 3. Endpoint of PFS and OS in patients with CNS relapse grouped by treatment allocation, and according to drug received Idarubicin vs Mitoxantrone.

n 3 yr PFS (95% CI) p-value 3 yr OS (95% CI) p-value
Intended SCT 91
Idarubicin 34 22·2% (9·9, 37·4) 34·0 (18·7, 49·9)
Mitoxantrone 57 55·0% (39·4, 68·1) 0·02 63·0% (46·7, 75·5) 0·02
Intended No SCT 19
Idarubicin 6 66·7% (19·5, 90·4) 66·7% (19·5, 90·4)
Mitoxantrone 13 61·5% (26·6, 83·7) 0·90 68·6% (21·3, 91·2) 0·81
Actual SCT 60
Idarubicin 21 36·4% (16·6, 56·6) 35·7% (16·1, 56·0)
Mitoxantrone 39 72·2% (52·8, 84·7) 0·02 76·0% (55·6, 87·9) 0·01
Actual No SCT 32
Idarubicin 14 28·6% (8·8, 52·4) 50·0% (22·9, 72·2)
Mitoxantrone 18 50·4% (22·6, 72·9) 0·20 59·2% (17·6, 85·4) 0·39