Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2014 Sep 11;84(1):202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.037

Figure 4. Silencing visual cortex does not alter SC speed tuning or time course in response to looming in awake mice.

Figure 4

(AB) Preferred speed analyzed by the mean (A) and peak (B) spiking rate, respectively. Spref_weighted was calculated as described in Experimental Procedures. No significant alteration of the preferred speed was seen (p=0.77 in A and 0.56 in B, n=15, paired t-test). (C) Spontaneous spiking rates of SC cells before and after silencing cortex. A trend of slight reduction was seen, but not statistically significant in our dataset (p=0.21, n=15, paired t-test). The spontaneous spiking rates were 1.7±0.9spikes/s for control condition, and 0.8±0.5spikes/s when cortex was silenced (mean±S.E.M.). (D) Instantaneous spiking rate in the awake SC, averaged across all cells (bin width of 100ms; n = 15; black for the control, blue for silencing cortex, and light blue dashed lines for normalized blue curves to the control’s peak). The control and the peak-normalized responses after silencing cortex were only significantly different at the late phase of the lowest speed, as marked by pink shades (p<0.05, paired t-test). Note that responses to stimuli with different speeds were plotted with different time scales.