Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 4;36(5):9714. doi: 10.1007/s11357-014-9714-4

Table 5.

Health outcomes among the different handgrip and quadriceps strength categories

Normal handgrip and normal quadriceps strength (n = 267) Weak handgrip and normal quadriceps strength (n = 134) Normal handgrip and weak quadriceps strength (n = 165) Weak handgrip and weak quadriceps strength (n = 198)
Median [IQR] Median [IQR] P valuea Median [IQR] P valuea Median [IQR] P valueb
Baseline characteristics
Femalec 184 (68.9) 90 (67.2) 0.723 117 (70.9) 0.662 130 (65.7) 0.776
Age (year) 81 [78; 85] 84 [80; 88] <0.001 82 [79; 86] 0.007 85 [80; 89] 0.165
N chronic diseasesd 3 [2; 5] 4 [3; 5] 0.346 4 [2; 6] 0.193 5 [3; 6] <0.001
Weight (kg) 76 [67; 84] 71 [61; 80] <0.001 71 [62; 81] 0.002 69 [60; 80] 0.826
Health outcomes at baselinee
EQ5D+c 0.81 [0.72; 0.89] 0.81 [0.69; 0.86] 0.948 0.81 [0.68; 0.84] <0.001 0.68 [0.30; 0.81] <0.001
GARS 25 [21; 31] 31 [25; 38] <0.001 29 [24; 36] <0.001 40 [32; 49] <0.001
 BADL 9 [9; 10] 9 [9; 11] 0.141 9 [9; 11] 0.001 11 [9; 17] <0.001
 IADL 16 [12; 21] 21 [16; 27] <0.001 20 [15; 25] <0.001 28 [22; 33] <0.001
GP contact-time (min)f 100 [40; 170] 100 [43; 198] 0.753 90 [40; 170] 0.693 185 [103;368] 0.005
Hospitalizationc 40 (15.0) 28 (21.1) 0.152 27 (16.4) 0.667 62 (31.6) 0.034
Gait speed (m/s) 0.67 [0.50; 0.84] 0.52 [0.36; 0.66] <0.001 0.50 [0.31; 0.65] <0.001 0.30 [0.05; 0.46] <0.001
Health outcomes at follow-upg
Mortalityc 8 (3.0) 7 (5.2) 0.812 6 (3.6) 0.708 10 (5.1) 0.825
EQ5D+c 0.81 [0.69; 0.89] 0.73 [0.56; 0.84] 0.044 0.81 [0.65; 0.84] 0.954 0.65 [0.26; 0.81] 0.479
GARS 28 [22; 35] 35 [29; 43] 0.156 33 [25; 41] 0.995 43 [34; 51] 0.379
 BADL 9 [9; 11] 11 [9; 14] 0.017 10 [9; 12] 0.785 13 [10; 19] 0.819
 IADL 18 [13; 25] 24 [19; 29] 0.294 23 [16; 29] 0.870 30 [24; 35] 0.419
Hospitalizationc 41 (19.6) 23 (23.5) 0.495 26 (20.3) 0.778 30 (21.7) 0.567
GP contact-time (min)f 100 [50; 170] 105 [53; 245] 0.706 120 [60; 240] 0.384 210 [73; 398] 0.697

aNumbers were compared to the normal handgrip and normal quadriceps strength group using general linear model (GLM) univariate analysis

bNumbers were compared to the weak handgrip and normal quadriceps strength group using GLM univariate analysis

cNumber (%)

dIncluding self-reported diabetes, heart failure, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, incontinence, arthritis, osteoporosis, dizziness, lower urinary tract symptoms, depression, anxiety, dementia, impaired vision, deafness, fracture, stroke/transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction

eGLM univariate analyses were corrected for age and sex

fGP contact information was available for 359 participants; the numbers of participants analyzed in the respective groups are 134, 67, 79, and 79

gGLM univariate analyses were corrected for age, sex and health outcome at baseline. Follow-up information was available for 570 participants: the numbers of participants analyzed in the respective groups are 208, 98, 127, and 137