Table 1.
Comparison of Deviations in Average Local Ancestry
| Region |
Jin et al.9 |
Current Study |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deviation | Nominal p Value | Deviation | Nominal p Value | |
| Chr1: 17,409,539–21,604,321 | −0.025 | 7.43 × 10−4 | −0.004 | 0.55 |
| Chr2: 241,750,403–242,568,618 | −0.023 | 2.07 × 10−3 | −0.006 | 0.44 |
| Chr2: 37,451,925–37,508,581 | 0.023 | 2.16 × 10−3 | 0.005 | 0.51 |
| Chr3: 116,930,811–118,313,302 | 0.025 | 8.58 × 10−4 | −0.002 | 0.83 |
| Chr6: 163,653,158–163,653,428 | 0.023 | 2.70 × 10−3 | 0.004 | 0.60 |
| Chr16: 61,214,438–61,242,497 | 0.023 | 2.26 × 10−3 | 0.006 | 0.41 |
We list the six regions reported by Jin et al.9 to have unusual deviations in local ancestry and compare these to our scan. The deviation is in the proportion of European local ancestry. None of the six regions replicated at nominal significance (p < 0.05) in our analysis. All positions are from UCSC Genome Browser build hg18.