Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;95(4):437–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.08.011

Table 1.

Comparison of Deviations in Average Local Ancestry

Region Jin et al.9
Current Study
Deviation Nominal p Value Deviation Nominal p Value
Chr1: 17,409,539–21,604,321 −0.025 7.43 × 10−4 −0.004 0.55
Chr2: 241,750,403–242,568,618 −0.023 2.07 × 10−3 −0.006 0.44
Chr2: 37,451,925–37,508,581 0.023 2.16 × 10−3 0.005 0.51
Chr3: 116,930,811–118,313,302 0.025 8.58 × 10−4 −0.002 0.83
Chr6: 163,653,158–163,653,428 0.023 2.70 × 10−3 0.004 0.60
Chr16: 61,214,438–61,242,497 0.023 2.26 × 10−3 0.006 0.41

We list the six regions reported by Jin et al.9 to have unusual deviations in local ancestry and compare these to our scan. The deviation is in the proportion of European local ancestry. None of the six regions replicated at nominal significance (p < 0.05) in our analysis. All positions are from UCSC Genome Browser build hg18.