Table 1.
Ref. | Diagnostic test | Study population | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Gran G, Aßmus J, Dyrhol-Riise AM. Screening for latent tuberculosis in Norwegian health care workers: high frequency of discordant tuberculin skin test positive and interferon-gamma release assay negative results. BMC Public Health 2013;13(1):353 | TST and the QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube test | 387 healthcare workers with possible exposure to TB in Norway History of BCG vaccination reported for 97.9 % |
4.7 % had both positive TST and positive QFT-GIT 55.3 % had a positive TST (≥6 mm) and 13.7 % a TST ≥15 mm 3.4 % had a positive QFT-GIT In mostly BCG-vaccinated population: high incidence of discordant TST/QFT-GIT results, with most TST+/QFT-GIT− |
Park JS, Lee JS, Kim MY. Monthly follow-ups of interferon-γ release assays among health-care workers in contact with patients with TB. Chest 2012 vol. 142 (6) pp. 1461–1468 | QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube assays were performed monthly for one year | Forty-nine healthcare workers in South Korea; contacts to patients with active pulmonary TB 91.7 % had BCG scars 40 % rarely wore N95 masks |
25 % had baseline positive QFT-GIT tests (>0.35 IU mL−1) 52 % had conversions/reversions when single cut-point of 0.35 IU mL−1 used on monthly testing. 10 % had conversions or reversions to 0.7 IU mL−1 ≥ 2 times during one year Frequent fluctuations around the single cut-point were seen, indicating possible variability of the assay, difficulty processing of the specimens, or varying individual T-cell responses to true TB exposure |
Fong KS, Tomford JW, Teixeira L, et al. Challenges of interferon-γ release assay conversions in serial testing of health-care workers in a TB control program. Chest 2012;142(1):55–62 | QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube | Retrospective chart review of 7,374 newly hired health care workers receiving QGT-GIT testing for screening at the Cleveland Clinic | 6.6 % had positive results, 4.1 % had indeterminate results. 52 HCWs later converted with no known TB exposure (median value was 0.63 IU mL−1). Of those, 10 had repeat QFT-GIT testing; eight had reversion. Single cut-point for positivity on serial testing may lead to conversions/reversions of unclear clinical significance |
Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A. Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing for progression from latent TB infection to disease state: a meta-analysis. Chest 2012;142(1):63–75 | TST, “in-house” IGRAs, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, and T-SPOT.TB | Meta-analysis of 28 studies evaluating PPV or NPV for progression to active TB. No participant had received preventive therapy. | Overall PPV for progression to TB was 2.7 % for the IGRAs vs. 1.5 % for the TST (p <0.0001). When the high-risk groups were considered in a sub-analysis, the PPV was 6.8 % [95 % CI, 5.6–8.3 %] for the IGRA vs. 2.4 % [95 % CI, 1.9–2.9 %] for the TST (p <0.0001) For high-risk individuals in particular, there was a suggestion of higher PPV for the IGRAs compared with TST |
Mancuso JD, Mazurek GH, Tribble D, et al. Discordance among commercially available diagnostics for latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185(4):427–34 | QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test, T-SPOT.TB test, TST, and Battey skin test using purified protein derivative from the Battey bacillus | Cross-sectional comparison study of 2,017 low-risk military recruits in South Carolina; simultaneous testing performed (tests listed at left). 1,826 recruits completed all tests | Specificity estimates were 99.3 % for TST, 98.7 % for the T-SPOT.TB, and 98.8 % for the QFT-GIT: no statistical difference Modest agreement was seen between the T-SPOT.TB and the QFT-GIT, kappa statistic=0.39 (95 % CI, 0.24–0.54) 77 % of those with a positive result were positive on only one test |
Zwerling A, van den Hof S, Scholten J, Cobelens F, Menzies D, Pai M. Interferon-gamma release assays for tuberculosis screening of healthcare workers: a systematic review. Thorax 2012;67(1):62–70 | TST, “in-house” IGRAs, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, Quantiferon Gold, and T-SPOT.TB | A systematic review of all IGRA studies in HCWs. 50 studies were included, five in high-TB-incidence areas | 24 of 25 studies comparing IGRA to TST had lower prevalence of positive IGRA than positive TST, with BCG vaccination not accounting for all difference Concordance was not strong between TST and IGRAs; k values ranged from 0.05 to 0.56 |
Rangaka MX, Wilkinson KA, Glynn JR, et al. Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays for incident active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2012;12(1):45–55 | “In-house” IGRAs, and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, and T-SPOT.TB | A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing ability of IGRAs and TST to predict development of active TB. 15 studies with >26,000 participants, including infants/ children and those with HIV-infection or other co-morbidities. Those who had taken preventive therapy were not excluded | Unadjusted IRR for positive vs. negative IGRA was 2.11 (95 % CI, 1.29–3.46). For TST >10 mm, the unadjusted IRR was 1.60 (95 % CI, 0.94–2.72) Unadjusted IRR for the ELISPOT assays (including T-SPOT.TB) was 2.64 [95 % CI, 1.41–4.93] vs. 1.82 [95 % CI, 1.11–2.97] for whole blood ELISA assays (including QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube), when compared with negative IGRA results |