Skip to main content
. 2014 May 7;10(6):1478–1493. doi: 10.4161/hv.29054

Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of past, present and future vaccines against Salmonella enterica.

Vaccine Advantages Disadvantages
     
A Vaccines of the Past    
Whole Cell Inactivated 73% 3-y efficacy Reactogenicity
     
B Established Vaccines    
1. Vi CPS Single dose Not licensed for infants
  Low reactogenicity Lack of memory response
  WHO prequalification Lack of affinity maturation
    Only protects against S. Typhi
     
2. Ty21a Oral administration Not licensed for infants
  Some cross-protection against Requires multiple doses
  S. Paratyphi B  
     
C New and Future Vaccines    
1. Vi glycoconjugate Higher efficacy than current vaccines Only protects against S. Typhi
  T-dependent antibody response  
  Memory induction  
  Affinity maturation  
  Low reactogenicity  
     
2. O-antigen glycoconjugate As for Vi glycoconjugates Only protects against serovars with same O-antigen specificity
     
3. New Live Attenuated Salmonella-specific B and T cell immunity Attenuating for optimal balance of immunity and reactogenicity
  Clearance of residual infection Breadth of coverage may be limited by insufficient expression of key antigens
    Possibility of disease in immunocompromised subjects
     
4. Recombinant Proteins Salmonella-specific B and T cell immunity Issues with antigen conformation may limit ability to induce effective B cell response
  Potential for pan-specific immunity  
  Low reactogenicity  
     
5. Proteins purified from whole Salmonellae Salmonella-specific B and T cell immunity Difficulties with purification of integral membrane proteins
  Potential for pan-specific immunity  
  Low reactogenicity  
     
6. GMMA Salmonella-specific B and T cell immunity Balance of reactogenicity and immunogenicity in man not currently known
  Potential for pan-specific immunity  
  Enrichment of membrane antigens  
  Ease of manufacture
Low cost-of-goods
 

Adapted with permission from reference 47.