Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 5;8(5):2215–2220. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2507

Table IV.

Proportions of rs9679162 genotype in various subgroups.

Subgroups TT, % Non-TT, % Subgroup subject number Current study vs. public data HWE P-value
HCC
 Viral 22.57 77.43 226 0.5659
 Non-viral 47.06 52.94 17 0.6446
 Total 24.18 75.82 244 0.7790
HapMap
 Luhya in Webuye, Kenya 54.55 45.45 110 <0.0001 0.0471
 Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria 48.30 51.70 147 <0.0001 0.8995
 Japanese in Tokyo, Japan 46.02 53.98 113 <0.0001 0.9959
 African ancestry in Southwest USA 42.11 57.89 57 <0.0001 0.9999
 Mexican ancestry in Los Angeles, California 36.21 63.79 58 0.0647 0.6739
 Han Chinese in Beijing, China 30.15 69.85 136 0.2138 0.7203
 Chinese in Metropolitan Denver, Colorado 28.44 71.56 109 0.4081 0.9005
 Maasai in Kinyawa, Kenya 25.00 75.00 156 0.8705 0.9873
 Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas 16.83 83.17 101 0.1294 0.7804
 Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry from the Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain collection 12.39 87.61 113 0.0097 0.4639
 Toscani in Italia 7.84 92.16 102 0.0004 0.0927
WTCCC
 British 1958 birth cohort 15.76 84.24 1504 0.0010 0.3033
 UK national blood service 17.01 82.99 1499 0.0063 0.9470
a

HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; WTCCC, The Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium.