Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods logoLink to Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods
. 2014 Mar 4;20(10):780–789. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0099

A Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Method for Isolating Clones from a Complimentary DNA Library in Sheep

Thor Einar Friis 1, Sally Stephenson 2, Yin Xiao 3, Jon Whitehead 4, Dietmar W Hutmacher 1,
PMCID: PMC4186646  PMID: 24447069

Abstract

The sheep (Ovis aries) is favored by many musculoskeletal tissue engineering groups as a large animal model because of its docile temperament and ease of husbandry. The size and weight of sheep are comparable to humans, which allows for the use of implants and fixation devices used in human clinical practice. The construction of a complimentary DNA (cDNA) library can capture the expression of genes in both a tissue- and time-specific manner. cDNA libraries have been a consistent source of gene discovery ever since the technology became commonplace more than three decades ago. Here, we describe the construction of a cDNA library using cells derived from sheep bones based on the pBluescript cDNA kit. Thirty clones were picked at random and sequenced. This led to the identification of a novel gene, C12orf29, which our initial experiments indicate is involved in skeletal biology. We also describe a polymerase chain reaction-based cDNA clone isolation method that allows the isolation of genes of interest from a cDNA library pool. The techniques outlined here can be applied in-house by smaller tissue engineering groups to generate tools for biomolecular research for large preclinical animal studies and highlights the power of standard cDNA library protocols to uncover novel genes.

Introduction

The sheep (Ovis aries) has many features that makes it highly suited as a large animal model for orthopedic research. Sheep have a body weight that is similar to humans and the size of their long bones allows the use of implants and internal fixation plates used in human clinical practice. Compared with other large animal models, such as dogs, goats, pigs, and non-human primates, sheep have docile temperaments, are easy to house, and relatively inexpensive to acquire and maintain. For these reasons the sheep is increasingly becoming the animal model of choice for bone tissue engineering research (reviewed in detail by Refs.1–4). The first sheep genome draft was released in 2009,5 however, there are still gaps in the annotated sequence information available in the sheep transcriptome, particularly when compared to other species, such as the cow, mouse, rat, or humans. Despite the great utility of sheep as an animal model, there is a lack of molecular tools that can be applied for musculoskeletal tissue engineering research such as sheep-specific antibodies or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers.

The construction of a complimentary DNA (cDNA) library reflects the gene expression from tissues or tissue-specific cells at a given time and is a valuable resource for biomolecular applications. The conversion of mRNA into cDNA is performed by a series of enzymatic reactions that involves the synthesis of first strand cDNA from the mRNA template with a reverse transcriptase followed by the conversion to a double-stranded cDNA and insertion into a cloning vector.6 The construction of a cDNA library can be readily performed by a laboratory with the necessary molecular biology facilities but for a tissue engineering group the task can represent a technical challenge.

In broad terms there are two different approaches one can take when performing cDNA library experiments. There is the high throughput approach, typically in the form of expressed sequence tags (ESTs), which are short (100–800 bp), randomly selected single-pass sequence reads derived from cDNA libraries.7 More recently, whole transcriptome sequencing, using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms such as Illumina, SOLiD, and 454 FLX, can sequence each transcript at a depth of 100–1000 reads, often as short as 50–500 bases. The NGS strategy heavily relies on advanced bioinformatics tools and computer resources to manage and analyze the terabytes of raw data often produced with these technologies.8 For research groups without the infrastructure, resources and skills sets needed for the NGS strategy, a conventional cDNA library strategy coupled with standard Sanger sequencing is still a valid means of adding to the body of genetic information for a given model species.

In this study, we describe the construction and characterization of a cDNA library using cells derived from sheep bones with an emphasis for tissue engineering groups that may not be specialized in molecular biology. Using this approach, we isolated the uncharacterized gene, C12orf29, and present our initial data that indicate it has a key role in skeletal biology. We also describe, in detail, the protocol used to isolate the full-length cDNA of ovine glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) using an inverse PCR method. This study demonstrates the utility of conventional cDNA library technologies to uncover novel genes that can greatly add to our basic knowledge of biology, the ground well from which biomedical sciences is ultimately informed.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Primary cell lines were established by explant cultures from sheep bones from mandible and tibia and bone marrow. The use of these samples had been approved by the Queensland University of Technology Animal Ethics committee (approval no. 700000915). The bone samples were processed by first removing the soft tissues; care was taken to remove all periosteal membranes. The bones were fragmented into smaller pieces, ∼15×6×6 mm, using a bone rongeur. The fragments were washed thrice in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), transferred to a clean 50 mL tube, and washed in 30% ethanol by vigorous shaking for 3–4 min. The ethanol was removed and the fragments were washed thrice in sterile PBS before being incubated for 10 min in 5 mL of 0.25% trypsin (Life Technologies) at 37°C. The fragments were washed again in sterile PBS to remove any residual trypsin, then transferred to a 175 cm2 (T175) tissue culture flask to which 25 mL of complete medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium [DMEM] containing 10% v/v fetal calf serum [BioWhittaker] 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, and 0.5 μg/mL Fungizone [Life Technologies]) was added. Osteoblast cells typically emerged from the bone fragments within 7 days of being explanted (Fig. 1A). Once confluent, the cell numbers were expanded, then trypsinized, and stored in liquid nitrogen for later use.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Bone explant cell culture and induction towards mineralization. (A) Osteoblast cells would typically emerge from the sheep bone fragments after 7 days in culture. Scale bar=300 μm. (B) Mineralization induction medium was applied to the p1 cells at ∼70–80% confluence. (C) The cells responded by laying down a crisscross patterned extracellular matrix following mineralizing media treatment. (D) Following 3 weeks of growth in mineralization medium there was robust evidence of mineralization as seen by Alizarin red staining. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tec

Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were isolated from biopsies taken from the iliac crest while the animals were under general anesthesia. Five milliliter of bone marrow was diluted in an equal volume of PBS in a 50 mL Falcon tube and 10 mL of Lymphoprep (Axis-Shield PoC AS) carefully placed underneath the bone marrow with a serological pipette. The erythrocytes were pelleted by centrifugation at 800 g for 20 min at room temperature. The upper layer of the column (∼10 mL) was removed and mixed with 30 mL of complete medium. Cells were plated out into T175 tissue culture flasks and unattached hematopoietic cells were removed by media change 24–48 h later. The cells were grown until confluency, typically 5×106 cells per flask, and then trypsinized and stored in liquid nitrogen for later use.

Mineralization induction

Three cell lines each from mandible, tibia, and BMSCs at passage 1 were plated out in T175 flasks and grown to 70–80% confluence (Fig. 1B) before being treated with mineralizing induction medium consisting of complete media containing 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 50 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich)9 for 3, 7, and 12 days (Fig. 1C). Mineralization controls were cultured in mineralization medium for 3 weeks and assessed by Alizarin red staining (Fig. 1D).10

RNA extraction and poly(A)+ mRNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted at each time point using an MN NucleoSpin RNA L Midi Kit (Scientifix) and the poly(A)+ mRNA fraction was enriched using an MN NucleoTrap poly(A)+ RNA kit (Scientifix) following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples from the respective time points were pooled, then ethanol precipitated and resuspended into RNAse-free water, and resuspended to a final volume of 250 ng/μL.

cDNA library construction

cDNA was prepared from 5 μg of poly(A)+ enriched RNA and was directionally ligated into the pBluescript II SK (+) XR vector, then chemically transformed into XL-10 Gold competent cells for propagation (Integrated Sciences, NSW, Australia) following the manufacturer's protocol.

Isolation of random clones from the library

Random colonies were picked from selective ampicillin agarose plates and propagated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. The plasmids were extracted using MN Nucleospin Miniprep kit (Scientifix) and analyzed by restriction enzymes to determine the presence of cDNA inserts. Positive clones were sequenced using M13 universal primer sites flanking the multiple cloning site. The samples were submitted to the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) for sequencing.

Sequence assembly and analysis

The sequences were BLAST searched to identify homologous genes in human and cow. Formatting and identification of open-reading frames (ORFs) was performed using the Sequence Manipulation Suite (www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/). The sequences were assembled using Microsoft Word 2010 and prepared for submission to GenBank using the Sequin program, which was downloaded from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Sequin/

Isolation of specific clones using the MACH protocol

Validation of the library was done by isolating a full-length clone of GAPDH, and a partial clone of transforming growth factor beta 3 (TGF-β3; data not shown). These clones were isolated using a modification of the MACH cDNA clone isolation protocol.11 This is a PCR-based protocol that makes use of two sets of abutting primers for inverse PCRs; the PCR products are subsequently separated by gel electrophoresis and annealed by base pair complementarities (Fig. 2A).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for isolation of specific clones from a complimentary DNA library pool. (A) Two PCRs were performed using two sets of inverse and abutting primers. The parent library was digested with DpnI restriction enzyme after which the PCR products are separated on an agarose gel and bands of equal sizes (∼5 kb) cut out and purified. The purified PCR products were combined in a single tube and denatured and annealed. Only strands with complementary overhangs, that is, 1+4 or 2+3, formed nicked circles, which when transformed into competent cells are repaired and replicated as circular plasmids. (B) The coding sequence of human glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA sequence was BLAST searched against the sheep genomic database to find an appropriate region in which to place the MACH primers. (C) The arrangement of the forward and reverse MACH primers is seen here. Two separate PCRs are set up with the inverse and abutting primer pairs R1/F2 and R3/F4. The outside (OS) primers are used to determine the abundance of the clone of interest. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tec

Primer design

The mRNA sequences of human GAPDH (NM_002046) was BLAST searched against the sheep virtual genome on the International Sheep Genome Consortium web portal (https://isgcdata.agresearch.co.nz/) to identify a suitable stretch of sequence for primers (Fig. 2B). The MACH primers are designed to abut with no overlaps such that reverse primer 1 (R1) abuts forward primer 2 (F2) and reverse primer 3 (R3) abuts forward primer 4 (F4). The primers pairs (R1/F2 and R3/F4) can be adjacent to each other such that primers F2 and R3 are complementary as was the case with the GAPDH MACH primers but can also be offset such that there is no overlap between F2 and R3. The outside primers (OS5′ and OS3′) flank the area of the MACH primers (Fig. 2C) and were used to identify the relative abundance of the gene of interest (GOI). The primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide Primers Used for MACH Clonal Isolation Protocol

Primer Sequence Length GC content (%) Tm (°C)
GAPDH OS5′ 5′-GACCACTGTCCACGCCAT 18 61.10 57.8
GAPDH OS3′ 5′-AACCTGGTCCTCAGTGTAGC 20 55.00 56.5
GAPDH R1 5′-ATGGCGTGGACAGTGGTC 18 61.10 57.8
GAPDH F2 5′-CACTGCCACCCAGAAGACT 19 57.90 57.1
GAPDH R3 5′-AGTCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTG 19 57.90 57.1
GAPDH F4 5′-GTGGATGGCCCTTCCGGGA 19 68.40 62.5

GAPDH, glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

PCR setup

All primers (Geneworks) were diluted to a working concentration of 10 μM and for each target gene 300 ng of cDNA library template was used in two separate reactions with primers R1/F2 and R3/F4. Each reaction was set up in a final volume of 50 μL using Phusion Hot Start II (Genesearch) following the manufacturer's instructions omitting the DNA polymerase. The reactions were preheated for 3 min at 98°C, after which 5 U (2.5 μL) of DNA polymerase was added per reaction. A touchdown PCR protocol was applied where the initial annealing temperature (Tm) was set 15°C above that of the lowest Tm of the primer sets and lowered 1°C per cycle over 15 cycles.12 The thermal cycling parameters are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Touchdown Polymerase Chain Reaction Temperature Cycling Parameters

Phase 1 Step Temp Time
1 Initial denature 98°C 3°min
Stop and add 2.5 μL Phusion polymerase per tube
Phase 2 Step Temp Time
2 Initial denature 98°C 20 s
3 Denature 98°C 10 s
4 TD anneal 70–55°C 30 s
5 Elongation 72°C 3′45″
Steps 3–5 repeated 15 times, temp decreasing 1°C/cycle
Phase 3 Step Temp Time
6 Denature 98°C 10 s
7 Anneal 58°C 30 s
8 Elongation 72°C 3′45″
Steps 6–8 repeated 33 times
Termination Step Temp Time
9 Elongation 72°C 7 min
10 Halt reaction 11°C 10 min

The Phusion DNA polymerase is added after the initial 3°min denaturation step. In the touchdown phase is the annealing temperature is set 12–15°C above the theoretical annealing temperature of the primers and lowered by 1°C for 15 cycles. After this the annealing temperature is set to 58–60°C.

DpnIdigest

The PCR products were column purified using a MN NucleoSpin Extract II kit (Scientifix) and eluted in 25 μL final volume. The template cDNA, which is methylated, was digested with DpnI restriction enzyme (Genesearch); the amplified PCR product, which is not methylated, is not digested by this restriction enzyme and therefore remains intact.

Gel separation and purification

The digested samples were loaded onto a 0.7% agarose gel and separated by electrophoresis. Equal sized DNA fragments were excised from the gels (Fig. 2A, step 3) and column purified and a 1 μL aliquot from each sample separated by gel electrophoresis for quality control.

Annealing step

Equal volumes (6 μL) of R1/F2 and R3/F4 purified PCR product was combined with 1.5 μL 10×NEB 2 buffer and 1.5 μL of water. The fragments were denatured once at 95°C for 5 min, and then annealed over four cycles at 65°C for 2 min and 25°C for 15 min. The PCR products can only circularize by forming complementary overhangs between R1+F4 and R3+F2 (Fig. 2A, step 4), which for the GAPDH primers was 21 bases long.

Transformation, plasmid extraction, and screening by analytical digest

The circularized plasmids were transformed into chemically competent α-Select Competent cells (Bioline) and the transformed cells plated out on ampicillin selective agarose. Colonies were picked the following day and grown in 500 μL of NZYM medium (10 g NZ amine, 5 g NaCl, 5 g yeast extract, and 2 g MgSO4.7H2O in 1 L of ddH2O, adjusted to pH 7.2) for 6 h, after which 1.5 mL of LB medium with 100 μg/mL ampicillin was added and grown overnight. Plasmid DNA was extracted using Nucleospin Miniprep kit and analyzed by restriction enzyme digests; positive samples were submitted to AGRF for sequencing.

Immunofluorescent confocal microscopy

Mandible osteoblasts (mOBs) grown in complete DMEM and human prostate cancer PC-3 cells (ATCC CRL-1435) grown in F12 HAMS with 10% fetal calf serum, were seeded onto glass coverslips and cultured for 72 h. After being fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X the cells were blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS for 1 h and then incubated with an antiC12orf29 rabbit polyclonal antibody (ab107423l; Abcam, Sapphire Biosciences) at 1:50 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were next labeled with an Alexa-Fluor 488 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:400; Life Technology) and counterstained with Rhodamine Phalloidin (1:1000; Life Technology) and DAPI (1:2000; Life Technology). The coverslips were mounted in Prolong Gold mounting medium. Confocal images were captured with a Leica TCS SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems) fitted with 40×and 63×oil immersion objectives. Image analysis was performed with the Leica LAS AF software package, and ImageJ (rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) was used to pseudo color the images.

Immunohistochemistry

Tibiae and femora were harvested from 2-month-old Wistar rats, fixed in 4% PFA for 48 h, and then decalcified in 10% EDTA over a period of 4–5 weeks. The samples were embedded in paraffin and sectioned to 5 μm thickness with a microtome. Standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols were applied and Proteinase K was used for antigen retrieval. The sections were incubated with an antiC12orf29 antibody (Abcam) at 1:75 dilution overnight at 4°C. After being washed, the slides were incubated with a DAKO biotinylated swine-anti-mouse, rabbit, goat secondary antibody (DAKO Australia Pty Ltd.) for 15 min, followed by 15 min incubation with horseradish perioxidase-conjugated avidin-biotin complex (DAKO Australia Pty Ltd.). Antibody complexes were visualized by the addition of a buffered diaminobenzidine. Safranin O staining was performed using a standard protocol.13 Images were acquired with a Zeiss Axio Imager microscope (Carl Zeiss Pty. Ltd.) and analyzed using the ZEN image software.

Western blot analysis

Sheep mOBs and periodontal ligament (PDL) cells were grown in complete DMEM in a six-well plate for 3 days then harvested in a lysis buffer (10 mM Tris HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics) after which the lysates were homogenized with a 23 g syringe and cell debris pelleted by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. Clarified lysates were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by semi-dry transfer (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked in 2% BSA-TBS-Tween then incubated with the Abcam antiC12orf29 antibody at 1:500 dilution then with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Thermo Scientific) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminesence and exposed on X-ray film (Fujifilm). A rabbit polyclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody (ab15246; Abcam) was used as a loading control and applied to the same membrane (1:2000 dilution) using the Licor Odyssey infrared system (Millenium Science).

Results

Result from isolation of randomly selected clones

A total of 30 randomly selected colonies were propagated in LB medium and the plasmid DNA extracted. Twenty-nine out of the 30 (96.6%) of the colonies contained cDNA inserts with an average size of 1141 nucleotides (nt), ranging from 268 to 3607 nt. Twenty of the clones (68%) had no existing sheep entries in GenBank and of these, the full coding sequence of 13 clones (65%) was identified. A complete mRNA sequence for O. aries FTH1 was assembled from two separate clones: clone p7.46 contained 84% of the existing O. aries FTH1 (NM_001009786.1), whereas the remaining 5′ end of the mRNA came from a 5′ FTH1 sequence that had hybridized to a TGF-β3 clone isolated using the MACH protocol. The assembled mRNA sequence (JX534528) contained an ORF that translated into 181 amino acids, which aligned with only 161 amino acids from the existing O. aries FTH1 protein (NP_001009786) but was 100% identical with the goat FTH1 protein sequence (ABL07498). NCBI has updated the GenBank version of O. aries FTH1 to reflect this (NM_001009786.2). The longest complete mRNA sequence isolated from the library was RNPS1 (JX534545), at 1855 nt, followed by SERPINH1 (JX534537) at 1813 nt; whereas the shortest mRNAs with complete coding sequences were RPL17 (JX534521) and RPS17 (JX534531), at 632 nt and 484 nt respectively. The longest clone was NIPAL3 (JX889615) at 3.6 kb and the shortest clone was HSP70 at 268 nt (JX534525), both of which were 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). GenBank accession numbers of the submitted sequences are listed in Table 3.

Table 3.

List of All Clones Isolated from the Complimentary DNA Library with GenBank Accession Numbers

Clone ID Gene description Gene name Ovine mRNA in GB Insert size CDS coverage GB accession number
p3.1 Stearoyl-CoA desaturase variant A SCD1 no 1402 no JX889613
p3.2 NIPA-like domain containing 3 NIPAL3 no 3607 no JX889615
p3.3 Cbp/p300-interacting transactivator 2 CITED2 partial 1518 complete JX534540
p3.4 Serpin peptidase inhibitor clade H member 1 SERPINH1 no 1813 complete JX534537
p3.5 Proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 2 PSMA2 no 888 complete JX534539
p3.6 Annexin A5 ANXA5 no 1729 partial JX534527
p3.7 MAX dimerization protein 4 MXD4 no 1021 complete JX534542
p4.1 Peptidylprolyl isomerase A PPIA partial 717 complete JX534530
p4.2 Syntaxin 12 STX12 no 524 no JX889612
p4.3 Peroxiredoxin 5 PRDX5 no 791 complete JX889614
p4.4 Cystatin c CST3 no 724 complete JX534543
p4.5 Coiled-coil domain containing 80 CCDC80 no 1434 partial JX534534
p4.6 Chromosome 12 open-reading frame 29 C12orf29 no 1176 complete HQ438587
p4.7 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 COIII complete 754 partial JX534526
p5.1 Ribosomal protein L17 RPL17 no 632 complete JX534521
p5.2 Catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1 CTNNB1 partial 817 partial JX534532
p5.4 Maspardin isoform b SPG21 no 933 partial JX534523
p5.5 Binding protein S1, serine-rich domain RNPS1 no 1855 complete JX534545
p5.7 Vimentin VIM partial 1509 partial JX534524
p6.1 CD9 molecule CD9 complete 626 partial JX534520
p6.2 Aminolevulinate, delta-, synthase 1 ALAS1 no 1700 partial JX534541
p6.3 Kallikrein-related peptidase 7, pseudogene KLK7 Ψ no 670 N/A JX534538
p6.4 Phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class F PIGF no 944 complete JX534535
p6.5 Ribosomal protein S17 RPS17 no 484 complete JX534531
p6.6 Homocysteine-inducible, endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducible, ubiquitin-like domain member 1 HERPUD1 no 762 partial JX534522
p6.7 Heat shock 70kDa HSP70 partial 268 no JX534525
p7.1 Mitochondrial DNA D-loop D-loop complete 764 no JX534533
p7.18 Ribosomal protein S8 RPS8 no 761 complete JX534536
p7.39 Tumor protein, translationally controlled 1 TCTP partial 834 complete JX534529
p7.46 Ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 FTH1 partial 929 complete JX534528
ACTB_SLIP Actin, beta ACTB complete 1905 complete HM067830
GAPDH_MACH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase GAPDH partial 1285 complete HM043737
TGF-β3_MACH Transforming growth factor, beta 3 TGF-β3 partial 1862 partial JX534544

Isolation of GAPDH using the MACH protocol

A full-length mRNA clone containing the gene GAPDH was isolated using the MACH isolation method adapted from Haerry and O'Connor.11 The sequence was 1285 nt long and contained the full ORF, translating into a 333 amino acid, which was 99.4% identical (331/333) with Bos taurus GAPDH (NP_001029206). A BLASTP search revealed that O. aries GAPDH has a unique amino acid substitution variation at amino acid 23. In the vast majority of animals this residue is a serine (S), whereas in the sheep this residue is a threonine (T); the nomenclature for this variation is p.S23T.14 This amino acid variation is caused by a nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism (snSNP) on the first base of codon 23, which in most animals is tct; in the sheep this codon is act (c.67T>A). Serine and threonine are both small hydrophilic amino acids, which differ only in that threonine has a methyl group instead of a hydrogen group found in serine. This is therefore a conservative substitution since both amino acids can reside within the interior and on the surface of a protein.15 The sequence of the isolated GAPDH clone was compared with partial O. aries mRNA sequences in GenBank (AF035421 and AF272837) and an EST (Oa1229.1) from an O. aries EST library published by Hecht et al.16 A threonine codon was found at this position in all three sequences, which suggests that this snSNP was not a sequencing artifact. The only other mammalian species that appears to share this serine to threonine substitution is the African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) although this particular sequence was predicted by automated computational analysis from a genomic sequence (XM_003410789) and has therefore not been verified. The only other amino acid substitution in O. aries GAPDH protein compared to B. taurus GAPDH is an asparagine to histidine substitution at position 55 (p.N55H), which is caused by a first base adenine to cysteine substitution (c.163A>C). This amino acid substitution, unlike the p.S23T substitution, is not unique to sheep; other animals such as pig (NP_001193288), rabbit (XP_002708267) and horse (NP_001157328) have histidine residues at this position. The GAPDH mRNA sequence has the GenBank accession number HM043737.

Initial characterization of C12orf29

Clone p4.6 contained the full-length mRNA sequence of the gene C12orf29 (accession number HQ438587), which translated into a 325 amino acid protein of unknown function. C12orf29 is a highly conserved gene that is found in all vertebrate species that have been sequenced to date. A rabbit polyclonal antiC12orf29 antibody became available from Abcam within months of our isolation of the clone and this greatly aided the initial characterization of this gene. Confocal immunofluorescent (IF) microscopy showed that C12orf29 was highly expressed in mOBs cells (Fig. 3A), whereas the prostate cancer cell line PC3 has a low constitutive expression (Fig. 3B) in the same culture conditions. C12orf29 also appears to be expressed in the extracellular matrix (ECM) laid down by the mOBs (Fig. 3A, arrows), which suggests that the protein is exported out of the cells and is embedded within the ECM. Confocal z-stack analysis of individual cells showed no evidence of C12orf29 being expressed in the nucleus. Immunohistochemical staining of the tibial growth plate of the 2-month-old rats shows C12orf29 positive staining in the mineralization zone of the growth plate and in the adjacent trabecular bone (Fig. 4), coinciding with areas that stain brightly red for the glucosaminoglycan stain Safranin O (inset Fig. 4). Western blot analysis of cell lysates from mOBs and PDL cells from sheep show that there was a high constitutive expression of a 37 kDa protein (Fig. 5), which is in agreement with the predicted size for C12orf29. Subsequent blocking peptide experiments using the C12orf29 peptide used to generate the antibody showed a significant reduction of the intensity of the 37 kDa bands (data not shown).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Immunofluorescent confocal microscopy showing endogenous C12orf29 expression in mandible osteoblasts (mOB) and PC3 cells. Cells were labeled with anti-C12orf29 antibody and the expression visualized using an Alexa-Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody shown here in green. The cell nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue) and cytoskeleton is stained with Rhodamine Phallioidin (red). Scale bars=20 μm. (A) A mOB cell showing strong C12orf29 staining throughout the cytosol and also in patches in the extracellular space (arrows). (B) A PC3 cell shows a faint but discernible C12orf29 staining within the cell. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tec

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Immunohistochemistry analysis of the tibial growth plate of a 2-month-old rat. Positive C12orf29 staining can be seen in the mineralized zone of the growth plate cartilage (red arrows) and also in the mineralized cartilage of the trabecular bone (arrowheads). These areas stain strongly red with Safranin O, evidence of high GAG/PG content (inset). Scale bar=250 μm. GAG, glycosaminoglycans; PG, proteoglycan. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tec

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from mOBs and periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs). Immunoblotting show high C12orf29 protein expression in both these cell types. The band has a molecular weight of ∼37 kDa, the predicted size of the 325 amino acid C12orf29 protein. An α-tubulin antibody was applied to the same membrane as a loading control.

Discussion

The first reports of cDNA libraries began to appear in 1975–197617–19 and the application of this procedure became commonplace during the 1980s, when reagents such as RNase H and DNA polymerase I (Pol I) simplified the process of second strand cDNA synthesis.20

The Stratagene pBluescript II XR cDNA library Construction Kit used in this study was primarily chosen on the basis that for a novice user, the relatively simple protocol of this kit—a plasmid-based system—greatly increased the chance of a successful outcome. The chemistries used with the pBluescript kit are essentially the same as those first described by Gubler and Hoffman in 1983,20 which was itself a modification of a system described by Okayama and Berg.21 Prior to these publications, the limiting step in library construction was the reliance of the Escherichia coli DNA Pol I to use the initial reverse transcript both as a primer and template for second strand cDNA synthesis. The result was a hairpin double-stranded DNA with the 5′ end of the mRNA in the single-stranded loop, which was cleaved with S1 nuclease digestive enzyme and resulted in loss of 5′ sequence information.18 Once recombinant RNase H became available, it was then used in combination with Pol I for second strand synthesis; the RNase H creates nicks in the DNA:RNA hybrid strand, which then serves as a template for the Pol I enzyme.

Other cDNA library systems such as the Clontech SMART system offer advantages that make them a better choice for experienced users. Some of these benefits is the fact that the SMART system requires considerably less polyA+ RNA template (1 μg vs. 5 μg for the pBluescript kit)—and if a Long-Distance PCR protocol is applied, as little as 50 ng of total RNA is sufficient; another benefit is that this system does not require methylation of the first strand as do other directional cloning methods, a process that is considered to be inefficient for cloning.22 More importantly, the SMART system is designed to enrich for full-length cDNA by using an oligonucleotide that binds to the poly cysteine cap at the 5′ end of the first strand cDNA,23 thereby effectively switching the reverse transcriptase template from the mRNA to the first strand cDNA. The parent template mRNA is removed by NaOH treatment, not RNase H as with conventional systems, and double-stranded cDNA is subsequently synthesized by thermostable DNA polymerase instead of Pol I DNA polymerase.24

Low versus high-throughput strategies

Two previous studies into the transcriptome of sheep bone had been performed using high-throughput EST library16 and massively parallel DNA sequencing platform approaches; the latter is known as NGS.25 Studies such as these generate large data sets that require high-performance computing infrastructure and specialized bioinformaticians to assemble and analyze. The study by Jager et al.,25 for example, analyzed over 830,000 contigs with an average length of 134 bp using the preassembly program Velvet, which were then extended using the de novo transcriptome assembly program Oases. This two-step approach yielded a total of 117,594 extended contigs with an average length of 1374 bp. These contigs were BLAST searched against cow, mouse, and sheep mRNA transcripts and any contigs that could not be assigned to any existing transcripts were excluded from further analysis.

By contrast, since our goal was not to conduct a major transcriptome study, we opted for a low-throughput approach with an emphasis on isolating individual clones of interest, and also characterize any novel genes identified from the random screening of colonies.

Library screening

Screening a large number of clones for GOI is a key step in many applications of recombinant DNA technology. Hybridization became the standard technique and is still widely used as the default screening method.26 In this procedure the colonies are first lifted onto nitrocellulose filters placed on the surface of agarose plates, and a reference set of these colonies is made by replica plating and stored at 4°C. The colonies are lysed and their DNA denatured and fixed to the filter. RNA probes, typically 32P-labeled, are then hybridized to the DNA and the fixed DNA with the GOI is located by autoradiography on X-ray film. The positive colonies are identified by aligning the X-ray film with the colonies on the original agarose plate.27 Although a large number of colonies can thus be screened, the use of nitrocellulose filters is a time-consuming task and tends to only work with highly expressed genes.26

PCR-based methods were developed in which cDNA clones were propagated as individual plaques on solid medium in 24-well plates and a phage suspension prepared from each well and transferred to a 96-well format—so-called arrayed PCR screening. This was followed by repeated PCR screening of incrementally smaller pools from which a positive signal had been observed. Although this approach did away with the need for filter hybridization and, more importantly, radioisotope labeling, the end result is a labor intensive and relatively insensitive method of screening.28–30

The MACH library screening method

Using the MACH protocol we were able to isolate several clones containing the full-length ORF of the housekeeping gene GAPDH from a cDNA library from cells derived from sheep bones. In addition, an 1862 nt sized clone containing the partial ORF of O. aries TGF-β3 was also isolated using this method (JX534544; data not shown). One of the main advantages of the MACH screening method is that it only requires the use of thermostable DNA polymerases and eliminates the need for costly and labile enzymes such as polynucleotide kinases and T4 DNA ligases. The linear PCR products form circularized plasmids by the action of basepair complementarity of the overhangs that form when the two PCR products are combined, denatured, and annealed.11 Thus, reverse strand 1 can only form a circularized product with forward strand 4, and likewise, the reverse strand 3 will only circularize with forward strand 2 (Fig. 2A, step 4). This mode of circularizing the plasmids is, in effect, a proofreading feature that ensures the high fidelity of the insert, since it is highly unlikely that two strands of unequal length or homology would anneal and form compatible overhangs. We found it unnecessary to perform the phenol-chloroform DNA extraction following the annealing step that was recommended in the original article11; this eliminates the risk of losing the plasmid DNA in the washing steps.

C12orf29: a novel gene with a role in skeletal biology

Prior to our isolation of the O. aries C12orf29 clone, the full mRNA sequence of the gene had already been identified in a number of other vertebrates and mammals. As it happened, the mRNA had also been isolated in sheep by Jager et al.25 but was wrongly annotated as CEP290, the 3′UTR of which, in all vertebrates, abuts the 3′UTR of C12orf29 on the opposite strand. The C12orf29 sequence from that study contained an atypical poly-adenylation signal (AATTAAA), similar to what we had identified in our clone; this feature was therefore unlikely to be an artifact. Their study does, however, provide an example that large data sets may obscure novel discoveries. C12orf29 immediately caught our attention as being the only gene in our relatively small sample of clones that had not been studied in any detail. The gene fitted the definition of a “conserved hypothetical protein” by having a wide phyletic distribution and unknown biochemical/physiological function.31 The timely availability of C12orf29-specific antibodies allowed us to start characterizing its protein expression, and these data suggested that the protein may be a secreted ECM protein, specific, but not necessarily limited, to skeletal cells and cartilage. IF microscopy showed a high protein expression in osteoblast cells (Fig. 3A), and in PDL cells and the preosteoblast cell line MC3T3-E132 (Supplementary Fig. S1A, B; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/tec). A discernible fluorescent signal was also seen in patches between the highly expressing cells (arrows, Fig. 3A), indicating that C12orf29 protein was being embedded in the ECM. The strong protein expression seen in these cells was in stark contrast to that seen in the PC3 cells; however, these cells displayed what appears to be a low constitutive expression that could be seen in the cytosol (Fig. 3B). IHC analysis showed that C12orf29 was expressed in the growth plate of 2-month-old rats. The expression was found in the mineralized zone of the growth plate and also in the trabecular bone and appeared to overlap with areas that stained strongly for Safranin O in the calcified cartilage in this region; there was no positive C12orf29 staining observed in any demineralized bone sections (data not shown). Finally, western blot analysis of whole cell lysates showed that mOB and PDL cells both strongly expressed a protein that was detected at ∼37 kDa, the predicted molecular weight of the 325 amino acid protein encoded by mammalian C12orf29 mRNA. Phylogenetic analyses show that C12orf29 has a pedigree that encompasses the width of the chordate superphylum.33 This indicates a role that is highly conserved and, therefore, physiologically important. Our initial characterization strongly suggests that C12orf29 has a role in the ECM of articular and growth cartilage and is, therefore, a novel structural protein in these skeletal tissues. We have yet to determine what post-translational modifications the protein undergoes, but we cannot rule out that it may be decorated with glucosaminoglycans and, therefore, potentially a proteoglycan.

Conclusions

We constructed a cDNA library from cells derived from sheep bone. The quality of the library was characterized and an initial screening of 30 random clones identified 20 genes that had no previous entries in the GenBank data base. The full-length cDNAs of the housekeeping genes GAPDH was isolated using the MACH protocol, described here in detail. From the randomly selected clones, we isolated a full-length cDNA of the uncharacterized gene C12orf29. The initial data concerning this gene suggest it has a role in skeletal biology and particularly in the ECM of cartilaginous tissues. Studies are currently underway to further characterize C12orf29.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (343.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Australian Research Council grant LP100200082 and the OA Foundation Australia grant C-10-61H.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.Martini L., Fini M., Giavaresi G., and Giardino R.Sheep model in orthopedic research: a literature review. Comp Med 51,292, 2001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pearce A.I., Richards R.G., Milz S., Schneider E., and Pearce S.G.Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 13,1, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muschler G.F., Raut V.P., Patterson T.E., Wenke J.C., and Hollinger J.O.The design and use of animal models for translational research in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 16,123, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reichert J.C., Saifzadeh S., Wullschleger M.E., Epari D.R., Schutz M.A., Duda G.N., et al. The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. Biomaterials 30,2149, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Archibald A.L., Cockett N.E., Dalrymple B.P., Faraut T., Kijas J.W., Maddox J.F., et al. The sheep genome reference sequence: a work in progress. Anim Genet 41,449, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Das M., Harvey I., Chu L.L., Sinha M., and Pelletier J.Full-length cDNAs: more than just reaching the ends. Physiol Genomics 6,57, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nagaraj S.H., Gasser R.B., and Ranganathan S.A hitchhiker's guide to expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis. Brief Bioinform 8,6, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang J., Chiodini R., Badr A., and Zhang G.The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. J Genet Genomics 38,95, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chaudhary L.R., Hofmeister A.M., and Hruska K.A.Differential growth factor control of bone formation through osteoprogenitor differentiation. Bone 34,402, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gregory C.A., Gunn W.G., Peister A., and Prockop D.J.An Alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal Biochem 329,77, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haerry T.E., and O'Connor M.B.Isolation of Drosophila activin and follistatin cDNAs using novel MACH amplification protocols. Gene 291,85, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Korbie D.J., and Mattick J.S.Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nat Protoc 3,1452, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosenberg L.Chemical basis for the histological use of safranin O in the study of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 53,69, 1971 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.den Dunnen J.T., and Antonarakis S.E.Nomenclature for the description of human sequence variations. Hum Genet 109,121, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Betts M.J., and Russel R.B.Amino Acid Properties and Consequences of Substitutions. Chichester, West Sussex, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hecht J., Kuhl H., Haas S., Bauer S., Poustka A., Lienau J., et al. Gene identification and analysis of transcripts differentially regulated in fracture healing by EST sequencing in the domestic sheep. BMC Genomics 7,172, 2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rougeon F., Kourilsky P., and Mach B.Insertion of a rabbit beta-globin gene sequence into an E. coli plasmid. Nucleic Acids Res 2,2365, 1975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Efstratiadis A., Kafatos F.C., Maxam A.M., and Maniatis T.Enzymatic in vitro synthesis of globin genes. Cell 7,279, 1976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rougeon F., and Mach B.Stepwise biosynthesis in vitro of globin genes from globin mRNA by DNA polymerase of avian myeloblastosis virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73,3418, 1976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gubler U., and Hoffman B.J.A simple and very efficient method for generating cDNA libraries. Gene 25,263, 1983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okayama H., and Berg P.High-efficiency cloning of full-length cDNA. Mol Cell Biol 2,161, 1982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu Y.Y., Machleder E.M., Chenchik A., Li R., and Siebert P.D.Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction. Biotechniques 30,892, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu X., Vatsyayan J., Gao C., Bakkenist C.J., and Hu J.Sumoylation of eIF4E activates mRNA translation. EMBO Rep 11,299, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Clontech. SMART cDNA Library Constrcution Kit User Manual. PR7Y2399 ed2007, Takara Bio, Mountain View, CA [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jager M., Ott C.E., Grunhagen J., Hecht J., Schell H., Mundlos S., et al. Composite transcriptome assembly of RNA-seq data in a sheep model for delayed bone healing. BMC Genomics 12,158, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Campbell T.N., and Choy F.Y.Approaches to library screening. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4,551, 2002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grunstein M., and Hogness D.S.Colony hybridization: a method for the isolation of cloned DNAs that contain a specific gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72,3961, 1975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alfandari D., and Darribere T.A simple PCR method for screening cDNA libraries. PCR Methods Appl 4,46, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bloem L.J., and Yu L.A time-saving method for screening cDNA or genomic libraries. Nucleic Acids Res 18,2830, 1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Munroe D.J., Loebbert R., Bric E., Whitton T., Prawitt D., Vu D., et al. Systematic screening of an arrayed cDNA library by PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92,2209, 1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Galperin M.Y., and Koonin E.V.‘Conserved hypothetical’ proteins: prioritization of targets for experimental study. Nucleic Acids Res 32,5452, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang D., Christensen K., Chawla K., Xiao G., Krebsbach P.H., and Franceschi R.T.Isolation and characterization of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast subclones with distinct in vitro and in vivo differentiation/mineralization potential. J Bone Miner Res 14,893, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Friis T.-E.The ancient gene C12orf29: an exploration of its role in the chordate body plan [Ph.D. Monograph]. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2013 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (343.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES