Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.014

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of fully quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative methods to detect a 70% stenosis by QCA.

Method AUC Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
QP 0.92 (82–97) 87 (66–97) 93 (81–99) 87 (66–97) 93 (81–99)
CER 0.78* (66–87) 57* (35–77) 91 (78–98) 76 (49–94) 80 (66–90)
SLP 0.82* (71–91) 87 (66–97) 68* (52–81) 59 (41–75) 91 (75–98)
INT 0.75* (63–85) 83 (61–95) 68* (52–81) 58 (39–75) 88 (72–97)
Duke 0.70* (57–80) 87 (66–97) 52* (37–68) 49 (33–65) 88 (70–98)
Clinical 0.78* (66–87) 83 (61–95) 73* (57–85) 61 (42–78) 89 (74–97)
*

p < 0.05 versus QP; statistical comparison of PPV and NPV was not performed. 95% confidence intervals are displayed in parenthesis.