Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 12;111(37):607–614. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0607

Table 1. Answers to selected questions on the questionnaire*.

Block No. Question Control arm Intervention arm p-value
Start of trial 6 months later Start of trial 6 months later
Patient‘s self-asssessment of knowledge 0.62
Very good 11% 9% 8% 6%
Good 51% 73% 45% 78%
Fair 32% 16% 39% 15%
Inadequate 4% 1% 7% 0%
Individual situation 1 Indication for oral anticoagulation known 87% 92% 99% 99% 0.06
2 Risk lowering 79% 85% 81% 94% 0.03
3 Treatment duration known 69% 82% 75% 94% 0.01
4 Frequency of checking known 87% 89% 78% 93% 0.08
5 INR (or Quick test) target range known 52% 71% 57% 83% 0.04
INR-relatedknowledge 6 Foods containing vitamin K <0.001
Types of cabbage 69% 71% 72% 94%
Lettuce 37% 49% 50% 75%
Spinach 48% 48% 48% 72%
Onions 8% 13% 12% 48%
7 Dietary recommendation for regular vitamin K intake 34% 43% 30% 70% <0.001
8 What to do about forgotten doses 13% 16% 14% 57% <0.001
9 Interactions with oral anticoagulation 0.007
Ginkgo biloba 4% 6% 5% 17%
Non-prescription drugs 22% 25% 18% 38%
Fasting, weight-loss diets 16% 17% 13% 28%
Gastroenteritis 21% 24% 15% 50%
Fever 6% 14% 4% 34%
Practical knowledge 10 Paracetamol is the safest analgesic available without a prescription 22% 27% 19% 64% <0.001
11 Knowing that insufficient anticoagulation cannot be felt
12 Recognition of emergencies and complications <0.001
Painful bumps under the skin, whether discolored or not 23% 34% 30% 56%
Sudden speach impairment 46% 52% 51% 76%
Black (tarry) stool 34% 54% 40% 79%
Limb weakness 22% 35% 25% 51%
13 Knowing when it is important to state that one is taking an oral anticoagulant 0.007
At the dentist‘s 90% 87% 90% 97%
At the pharmacy 26% 21% 28% 52%
Before getting an injection 44% 40% 43% 64%
When a new drug is prescribed 54% 52% 54% 64%
Before undergoing any invasive medical procedure 90% 88% 86% 90%

*The p-values relate to the hypothesis of an effect of the intervention in question in the hierarchical model; the dependent variable for the patients‘ self-assessment of knowledge was a score on the 1-to-4 scale; for other questions, the probability of a correct answer was modeled.

INR, international normalized ratio.