Table 4.

p values for a paired Students t-test comparing the improvement in CaP detection performance (in terms of AUC and accuracy) of ${\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$ over h^T2, h^T1, h^ADC, h^Feats, and h^Em respectively. Improvements in accuracy and AUC for ${\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$ were found to be statistically significantly better (p < 0.01) compared to each of h^T2, h^T1, h^ADC, h^Feats, and h^Em respectively; the null hypothesis being that no improvement was seen via ${\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$ in each comparison.

	${\mathbf{h}}^{T2}/{\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$	${\mathbf{h}}^{T1}/{\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$	${\mathbf{h}}^{ADC}/{\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$	${\mathbf{h}}^{\mathit{\text{Feats}}}/{\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$	${\mathbf{h}}^{Em}/{\mathbf{h}}_{MRF}^{Em}$
AUC	2.15e-07	1.40e-05	1.33e-04	5.86e-06	2.43e-04
Accuracy	9.64e-08	3.16e-08	1.89e-05	3.32e-05	3.32e-05