Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;134(2):273–281. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4223

TABLE 4.

Final Models of Logistic Regression Predicting OSAS at 2 Severity Levels

β OR 95% CI
No OSAS versus 1 ≤ OAHI <5
 Male gender 0.331 1.39 0.66–2.92
 Age 0.031 1.01 0.93–1.11
 Waking Spo2 values <96%a −2.065a 0.13 0.06–0.27
7.89a 3.66–17.02a
 Habitual snoring 1.016 2.76 1.24–6.17
 FEV1, percent predicteda −0.041 0.96 0.93–0.99
 Caretaker education < high school 0.546 1.73 0.71–4.22
 Non–preterm birth 1.606 4.98 1.18–20.97
 Environmental tobacco smoke exposure 0.550 1.73 0.77–3.92
No OSAS versus OAHI ≥5
 Male gender 0.836 2.31 0.64–8.25
 Age −0.122 0.89 0.77–1.02
 Waking Spo2 values <96%a −1.706a 0.18 0.05–0.61
5.51a 1.631–18.61a
 Habitual snoring 2.829 16.93 4.98–57.50
 FEV1, % predicted −0.320 0.97 0.93–1.01
 Caretaker education less than high school 0.500 1.65 0.35–7.69
 Non–preterm birth 1.026 2.79 0.41–18.18
 Environmental tobacco smoke exposure −0.247 0.78 0.21–2.94
a

When the β-value is negative, significant associations will have ORs <1, which means that a lower variable value is associated with a greater odds of being a member of an OSAS group. To improve clinical interpretability of the significant but negative ORs, we “reformatted” some of them to present the effect with an OR >1.