Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;27(4):783–822. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00003-14

TABLE 2.

Comparison of FDA-cleared molecular methods for detection of microorganisms in positive blood culture broths

Test Targets Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Time to result (h) Format and setup References
Verigene BC-GP 12 Gram-positive genus or species targets and 3 resistance markers (mecA, vanA, vanB) 92–100 98–100 2.5 On-demand, microarray, automated sample processor, manual transfer of array to analyzer 9597, 107
Verigene BC-GN 8 Gram-negative genus or species targets and 6 resistance markers (KPC, NDM, CTX-M, VIM, IMP, OXA) 81–100 98–100 2 On-demand, microarray, automated sample processor, manual transfer of array to analyzer 101, 102
FilmArray BCID 8 Gram-positive, 11 Gram-negative, and 5 yeast genus or species targets, 4 resistance markers (mecA, vanA/B, KPC, NDM) 88–100 94–100 1 On-demand, parallel miniaturized singleplex RT-PCR, full sample-to-result capability 85, 90
GeneOHM StaphSR S. aureus, MRSA 50–100 98–99 2 Batch, RT-PCR, offline manual sample lysis, extraction, and RT-PCR setup 63, 7880
Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture S. aureus, MRSA 69–100 98–100 1 On-demand, RT-PCR, full sample-to-result capability 259261
Septifasta 6 Gram-positive, 8 Gram-negative, and 5 yeast targets and A. fumigatus 42–79 67–97 6 Batch, 1.5–10 ml whole blood; offline extraction and setup of 3 parallel RT-PCRs 7577
a

Not cleared by FDA for clinical use. Data are from direct analysis of whole blood.