Table 2.
Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for associations between socioeconomic positions and poor self-rated oral health (SROH) among 3201 men and women aged 25–50 years in Japan during 2010–2011
Independent variable | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
Occupations | |||
Professionals | 1.00 | ||
Office workers | 1.05 | (0.79 to 1.39) | 0.75 |
Blue-collar workers | 1.44 | (1.07 to 1.95) | 0.017 |
Household income | |||
Lowest tertile | 1.72 | (1.38 to 2.16) | <0.0001 |
Second tertile | 1.18 | (0.94 to 1.48) | 0.15 |
Highest tertile (richest) | 1.00 | ||
Wealth (household financial and other assets) | |||
Lowest tertile | 1.93 | (1.51 to 2.46) | <0.0001 |
Second tertile | 1.55 | (1.20 to 1.99) | 0.0007 |
Highest tertile (richest) | 1.00 | ||
Educational attainment | |||
High school or less | 1.98 | (1.63 to 2.42) | <0.0001 |
Vocational/junior college | 1.38 | (1.14 to 1.68) | 0.0012 |
University or more | 1.00 | ||
Economic situation at home when respondents were 5 years old | |||
Poor, very poor | 1.61 | (1.25 to 2.08) | 0.0003 |
Normal | 1.07 | (0.86 to 1.34) | 0.55 |
Well off, very well off | 1.00 | ||
Economic situation at home when respondents were 15 years old | |||
Poor, very poor | 1.53 | (1.20 to 1.95) | 0.0006 |
Normal | 0.91 | (0.74 to 1.11) | 0.33 |
Well off, very well off | 1.00 |
SROH was assessed by the following question. “Overall, how would you rate the health of your teeth and gums?” Potential responses ranged from “(1) excellent, (2) good, (3) fair, (4) not so good to (5) Poor.” In the analysis, the outcome was dichotomised: “(1) excellent and (2) good, (3) Fair” as “Good SROH,” and “(4) not so good and (5) Poor” as “Poor SROH”.