Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 3;4(10):e005701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005701

Table 2.

Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for associations between socioeconomic positions and poor self-rated oral health (SROH) among 3201 men and women aged 25–50 years in Japan during 2010–2011

Independent variable OR 95% CI p Value
Occupations
 Professionals 1.00
 Office workers 1.05 (0.79 to 1.39) 0.75
 Blue-collar workers 1.44 (1.07 to 1.95) 0.017
Household income
 Lowest tertile 1.72 (1.38 to 2.16) <0.0001
 Second tertile 1.18 (0.94 to 1.48) 0.15
 Highest tertile (richest) 1.00
Wealth (household financial and other assets)
 Lowest tertile 1.93 (1.51 to 2.46) <0.0001
 Second tertile 1.55 (1.20 to 1.99) 0.0007
 Highest tertile (richest) 1.00
Educational attainment
 High school or less 1.98 (1.63 to 2.42) <0.0001
 Vocational/junior college 1.38 (1.14 to 1.68) 0.0012
 University or more 1.00
Economic situation at home when respondents were 5 years old
 Poor, very poor 1.61 (1.25 to 2.08) 0.0003
 Normal 1.07 (0.86 to 1.34) 0.55
 Well off, very well off 1.00
Economic situation at home when respondents were 15 years old
 Poor, very poor 1.53 (1.20 to 1.95) 0.0006
 Normal 0.91 (0.74 to 1.11) 0.33
 Well off, very well off 1.00

SROH was assessed by the following question. “Overall, how would you rate the health of your teeth and gums?” Potential responses ranged from “(1) excellent, (2) good, (3) fair, (4) not so good to (5) Poor.” In the analysis, the outcome was dichotomised: “(1) excellent and (2) good, (3) Fair” as “Good SROH,” and “(4) not so good and (5) Poor” as “Poor SROH”.