Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;82(10):4056–4067. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01643-14

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Kinetics of host-parasite interactions at the site of infection. (A) Ai6 mice were infected with 104 Pru-Cre-tdTomato parasites i.p., and the PECs were subsequently analyzed by flow cytometry at 3, 5, and 10 dpi. Innate cell populations were first gated through singlets, live cells, and dump (CD3, CD19, NK1.1). Further division into subsets allowed for differentiation of DCs (CD11c+, MHCII+), monocytes (non-DCs, CD11b+, Ly6G, Ly6C+), resident macrophages (non-DCs, CD11bHI, Ly6G, Ly6C), and neutrophils (non-DCs, CD11b+, Ly6G+, Ly6Cint). The interactions of each of these subsets with the parasite were analyzed by plotting Toxo-tdTomato versus ZsGreen1 fluorescence. The average percentage of each quadrant is shown. (B) Quantitation of the percentage and number of cells of each fluorescent quadrant, i.e., Toxo+ ZsGreen1 (Toxo+), Toxo+ ZsGreen1+ (DP), and Toxo ZsGreen1+ (U-I), versus days postinfection shows the kinetics of each type of host-parasite interaction at the site of infection. (n = 3 for each time point; averages ± standard errors of the means [SEM] are shown).