Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;58(10):5801–5808. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03205-14

TABLE 2.

Comparison of MICs between REMA- and Lux-based methods for a diverse set of 1,114 compounds

Analysis parameter REMA- vs D3 Luxa REMA- vs D7 Luxa D3 Lux vs D7 Lux exposure
No. of compounds with ≤4-fold shift in MIC 1,072 1,064 1,053
No. of compounds with ≥8-fold shift in MIC 42 50 61
% mismatch 3.7 4.4 5.4
a

Lux-based assay with 3-day (D3) or 7-day (D7) exposures.