Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2009 Feb 27;7260:72603I. doi: 10.1117/12.811899

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a), (g) 3 T in vivo endorectal T2-w prostate MR images CT2 for two different patient studies (in each row), with manually placed bounding-boxes (in yellow) which serves as model initialization for MANTRA; (b), (h) resulting prostate boundary segmentations via MANTRA (in yellow). The WMHS CH corresponding to the MRI sections in (a), (g) with CaP extent outlined in blue by a pathologist are shown in (c) and (i), respectively. The result of registration of CH ((c), (i)) to CT2 ((b), (h)) via COLLINARUS are sh CT2 own in (d) and (j) respectively. Note the warped appearance of the WMHS in (d) and (j), which is now in spatial correspondence with CT2 in (b) and (h) respectively. (e) and (k) show the mapping of the CaP extent (in green) from CH onto CT2, following alignment to CT1,5 . (f) and (1) show the corresponding mapping of spatial CaP extent (in green) from the newly aligned CH to CT1,5.