Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e107957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107957

Table 5. Ridge-regression vs elastic-net.

par. obs. stat. p-value
sample size (Inline graphic) 42.231 <0.001
number of features (Inline graphic) 61.468 <0.001
saturation (Inline graphic) 82.652 <0.001
signal-to-noise (Inline graphic) 1.515 0.023
correlation (Inline graphic) 6.099 <0.001
sample size vs number of features (Inline graphic) 2.335 <0.001
sample size vs saturation (Inline graphic) 6.994 <0.001
sample size vs signal-to-noise (Inline graphic) 1.049 0.365
sample size vs correlation (Inline graphic) 0.675 0.996
number of features vs saturation (Inline graphic) 30.782 <0.001
number of features vs signal-to-noise (Inline graphic) 1.239 0.075
number of features vs correlation (Inline graphic) 1.685 <0.001
saturation vs signal-to-noise (Inline graphic) 1.417 0.009
saturation vs correlation (Inline graphic) 0.539 1.000
signal-to-noise vs correlation (Inline graphic) 0.739 0.967

Permutation tests for equality of the group distributions using distance components analysis (lines 2 to 6), and permutation F-tests for the presence of 2-by-2 interactions (lines 7 to 16), in the comparison of ridge-regression vs elastic-net. Results based on 999 permutations.