Table 5. Ridge-regression vs elastic-net.
par. | obs. stat. | p-value |
sample size () | 42.231 | <0.001 |
number of features () | 61.468 | <0.001 |
saturation () | 82.652 | <0.001 |
signal-to-noise () | 1.515 | 0.023 |
correlation () | 6.099 | <0.001 |
sample size vs number of features () | 2.335 | <0.001 |
sample size vs saturation () | 6.994 | <0.001 |
sample size vs signal-to-noise () | 1.049 | 0.365 |
sample size vs correlation () | 0.675 | 0.996 |
number of features vs saturation () | 30.782 | <0.001 |
number of features vs signal-to-noise () | 1.239 | 0.075 |
number of features vs correlation () | 1.685 | <0.001 |
saturation vs signal-to-noise () | 1.417 | 0.009 |
saturation vs correlation () | 0.539 | 1.000 |
signal-to-noise vs correlation () | 0.739 | 0.967 |
Permutation tests for equality of the group distributions using distance components analysis (lines 2 to 6), and permutation F-tests for the presence of 2-by-2 interactions (lines 7 to 16), in the comparison of ridge-regression vs elastic-net. Results based on 999 permutations.