Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2011 Aug 19;42(3):607–616. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001607

Table 1.

Characteristics of hypothesis-driven candidate gene studies and the ISC GWAS.

Characteristic Candidate gene studies ISC

Studies 1,375 -

Genes (autosomal) 732 -

Markers (autosomal)
 Total 6,934 1,948,385
 Markers per gene, median (IQR) 2 (1–5) 9 (1–34)
 Genes with 1, 2, or 3 markers 65.9% n/a
 Marker density per gene as kb/SNP, median (IQR) 15.4 (4.69–46.2) 1.38 (0.69–2.47)

Sample size Median (range) a Actual
 Total subjects 412 (27–5,623) 6,909
 Number of cases 191 (5–2,434) 3,322
 Number of controls 214 (12–4,899) 3,587

Major annotation clusters from pathway analysis Enrichment score
 Synaptic transmission 52.2 n/a
 Neuronal development and morphogenesis 32.4
 Regulation of synaptic transmission 22.6
 Response to chemical stimuli 22.2

Statistical power b 0.48 0.89

Proportion of autosomal RefSeq genes studied c 0.037 0.902

Proportion of genes in top 4 DAVID annotation clusters studied 0.067 n/a
a

Biased due to subject overlap across publications.

b

See text for assumptions.

c

For ISC, assuming gene boundaries expanded by ±10 kb and SNP density < 20 kb/SNP.

IQR=inter-quartile range. FDR=false discovery rate. GRR=genotypic relative risk. MAF=minor allele frequency.