Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;25(4):96–110. doi: 10.7171/jbt.14-2504-002

TABLE 4.

Presence of PCR Inhibitors Assessed by qPCR

Samples Qv
Qm
iG
Ab
Cq mean undil Cq mean 10-fold dil ΔCq mean (10-fold dil-undil) Cq mean undil Cq mean 10-fold dil ΔCq mean (10-fold dil-undil) Cq mean undil Cq mean 10-fold dil ΔCq mean (10-fold dil-undil) Cq mean undil Cq mean 10-fold dil ΔCq mean (10-fold dil-undil)
    1 23.4 26.4 3.1 24.2 24.1 0.1 22.5 24.2 1.7 29.3 25.0 4.3
    2 25.5 28.2 2.8 32.2 27.3 4.9 24.5 25.6 1.1 31.0 31.0 0.0
    3 23.8 26.8 3.0 24.1 25.4 1.3 27.3 27.9 0.6 30.5 30.3 0.2
    4 27.5 30.2 2.8 30.2 29.9 0.4 29.9 28.7 1.1 37.3 36.9 0.5
    5 28.6 32.3 3.8 27.6 30.9 3.2 28.4 30.9 2.5 37.2 37.0 0.2
    6 28.2 30.2 2.0 26.9 29.6 2.8 29.0 29.4 0.4 35.4 35.1 0.3
No. of inhibited samples 1/6 4/6 6/6 6/6

Theoretical change in comparative threshold (ΔCq; Cq 10-fold diluted sample − Cq undiluted sample) = 3.3. There is no inhibition if ΔCq experimental (Cq 10-fold diluted sample − Cq undiluted sample) = 3.3 (±0.5). Inhibited qPCR reactions are indicated in bold italic. Negative ΔCq indicates a strong inhibition. undil, Undiluted DNA sample; dil, diluted sample.