Table 5.
Sensitivity analyses comparing 3 groups of the Active Plus intervention at the 12-month follow-up
| Control group | Print-delivered intervention (PB & PE) | Web-based intervention(WB & WE) | ICER b | CEAF d and probability highest NMB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costs a | Effect | Costs a | Effect | Costs a | Effect | |||
| PA (MET hours/week) | 2760 (5301) | −2.2 | 2384 (4483) | 2.9 | 2789 (5992) | 0.2 | Print dominant | Print at any threshold |
| Print: 96% | ||||||||
| QALY-EQ-5D-3Lc | 2739 (5293) | 0.884 | 2365 (4427) | 0.879 | 2800 (6054) | 0.886 | 79196 (Print vs. C) | <€65000 Print, >€65000 C |
| Print: 65% | ||||||||
| Control group | Basic intervention (PB & WB) | Environmental intervention (PE & WE) | ICER b | CEAF d and probability highest NMB | ||||
| Costs a | Effect | Costs a | Effect | Costs a | Effect | |||
| PA (MET hours/week) | 2760 (5301) | −2.2 | 2771 (5375) | 1.9 | 2400 (5203) | 1.2 | 503 (Environment vs. Basic) | <€550 Environment, >€550 Basic |
| Basic: 68% | ||||||||
| QALY-EQ-5D-3Lc | 2739 (5293) | 0.884 | 2754 (5381) | 0.879 | 2415 (5206) | 0.886 | Environment dominant | Environment at any threshold |
| Environment: 75% | ||||||||
PB = printed basic intervention, PE = printed environmental intervention, WB = Web-based basic intervention, WE = Web-based environmental intervention, C = control group.
aIn Euros; bcalculated according to the formula ICER = (Ci-Cc)/(Ui-Uc); cBased on the Dutch algorithm for the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) scores; dCost-effectiveness acceptability frontiers (CEAF); eProbability of highest net monetary benefit (NMB) based on WTP = €20,000.