Table 2.

Binary logistic regression of financial stress – social support model in relation to low psychological well-being in men and women

	Low psychological well-being
	Men			Women
	N 36 444 a	%	OR (95% CI) b, c	N 42 648 a	%	OR (95% CI) b, d
		*** e			*** e
No financial stress—high tangible social support	1935f	8.1g	1 (ref)	3535f	13.9g	1 (ref)
Medium financial stress—high tangible social support	716	16.0	1.65 (1.50–1.82)***	1707	22.5	1.41 (1.32–1.51)***
High financial stress—high tangible social support	440	26.9	2.94 (2.59–3.32)***	1104	35.8	2.37 (2.17–2.58)***
No financial stress—low tangible social support	533	14.9	2.06 (1.85–2.29)***	716	25.5	2.51 (2.28–2.76)***
Medium financial stress—low tangible social support	286	25.5	3.24 (2.79–3.75)***	509	37.1	3.23 (2.86–3.65)***
High financial stress—low tangible social support	339	45.3	6.73 (5.75–7.89)***	542	57.0	5.89 (5.13–6.77)***

The data are presented as numbers and percentages of participants with low psychological well-being within each subgroup, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

***p ≤ 0.001.

^aTotal number of participants included in the analysis.

^bAdjusted for age, country of birth, employment status, other chronic disease, and year of survey.

^cNagelkerke R ² = 0.130.

^dNagelkerke R ² = 0.145.

^eχ² test of differences between the subgroups within each sex.

^f Number of participants within each subgroup who reported low psychological well-being.

^gPercentage of participants within each subgroup who reported low psychological well-being.