Table 4. Comparison of savings achieved and readmissions prevented for post-discharge programs with different costs and efficacies.
Comparison of savings | ||||||||
Savings or losses | Readmissions prevented | |||||||
Cost of intervention | Efficacy | Patient-specific analysis and classifier | Patient-specific analysis and LACE | Intervention applied to all patients | Best uniform policy | Patient-specific analysis and classifier | Patient-specific analysis and LACE | Best uniform policy |
$300 | 25% | 16.2% | 15.9% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 25.0% | 24.5% | 25.0% |
35% | 26.2% | 26.2% | 26.2% | 26.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | |
$800 | 25% | 5.4% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 17.4% | 2.9% | 25.0% |
35% | 13.2% | 9.1% | 11.5% | 11.5% | 31.4% | 22.2% | 35.0% | |
$1,300 | 25% | 0.7% | 0.0% | −13.2% | 0.0% | 5.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
35% | 3.8% | 0.5% | −3.2% | 0.0% | 18.2% | 2.6% | 0.0% | |
$1,800 | 25% | 0.3% | 0.0% | −27.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
35% | 0.8% | 0.0% | −17.8% | 0.0% | 7.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Three policies are compared: patient specific analysis using the classifier, patient-specific analysis using LACE, best uniform policy. For comparison of savings an additional column demonstrates the policy that applies intervention to every patient may lead to loss (or savings).