Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e109264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109264

Table 4. Comparison of savings achieved and readmissions prevented for post-discharge programs with different costs and efficacies.

Comparison of savings
Savings or losses Readmissions prevented
Cost of intervention Efficacy Patient-specific analysis and classifier Patient-specific analysis and LACE Intervention applied to all patients Best uniform policy Patient-specific analysis and classifier Patient-specific analysis and LACE Best uniform policy
$300 25% 16.2% 15.9% 16.2% 16.2% 25.0% 24.5% 25.0%
35% 26.2% 26.2% 26.2% 26.2% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
$800 25% 5.4% 1.3% 1.5% 1.5% 17.4% 2.9% 25.0%
35% 13.2% 9.1% 11.5% 11.5% 31.4% 22.2% 35.0%
$1,300 25% 0.7% 0.0% −13.2% 0.0% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0%
35% 3.8% 0.5% −3.2% 0.0% 18.2% 2.6% 0.0%
$1,800 25% 0.3% 0.0% −27.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%
35% 0.8% 0.0% −17.8% 0.0% 7.3% 0.0% 0.0%

Three policies are compared: patient specific analysis using the classifier, patient-specific analysis using LACE, best uniform policy. For comparison of savings an additional column demonstrates the policy that applies intervention to every patient may lead to loss (or savings).