Table 3.

Empirical rejection rates and powers of two-sample tests under the correct imputation model; The null hypothesis scenario corresponds to the first column (I vs. II). The second and third columns (I vs. III and I vs. IV) indicate powers. Configuration I is the generation model for group 1 (Z = 1), which is fixed, and configurations II, III, and IV correspond to the generation models for group 2 (Z = 0).

n	% missing in configuration I	Method	10% missing in configurations II, III, and IV
			( ${\eta }_1^{(2)},{\eta }_2^{(2)}$)	( ${\eta }_1^{(2)},{\eta }_2^{(2)}$)	( ${\eta }_1^{(2)},{\eta }_2^{(2)}$)
			= (−2.65, 0.5)	= (−2.6, 0.5)	= (−2.68, 0.5)
			I vs. II	I vs. III	I vs. IV
200	20%	m=1	0.056	0.085	0.634
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.050	0.088	0.659
	= (−1.38, 0)	CC	0.062	0.075	0.601
	30%	m=1	0.060	0.070	0.548
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.054	0.075	0.578
	= (−0.1, −1)	CC	0.096	0.046	0.369
	40%	m=1	0.054	0.089	0.566
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.046	0.092	0.585
	= (−0.1, −0.36)	CC	0.105	0.058	0.398
	30%	m=1	0.057	0.095	0.649
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.054	0.079	0.663
	= (−1.38, 0.56)	CC	0.059	0.077	0.693
	40%	m=1	0.056	0.099	0.562
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.049	0.090	0.599
	= (−1.38, 1.1)	CC	0.072	0.117	0.712
400	20%	m=1	0.053	0.126	0.896
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.050	0.128	0.924
	= (−1.38, 0)	CC	0.061	0.115	0.897
	30%	m=1	0.061	0.118	0.861
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.050	0.121	0.886
	= (−0.1, −1)	CC	0.138	0.057	0.712
	40%	m=1	0.050	0.129	0.822
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.049	0.119	0.868
	= (−0.1, −0.36)	CC	0.113	0.064	0.687
	30%	m=1	0.057	0.117	0.867
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.054	0.118	0.878
	= (−1.38, 0.56)	CC	0.059	0.146	0.909
	40%	m=1	0.057	0.120	0.829
	( ${\eta }_1^{(1)},{\eta }_2^{(1)}$)	m=10	0.056	0.128	0.856
	= (−1.38, 1.1)	CC	0.070	0.204	0.928