Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 23;2014:703215. doi: 10.1155/2014/703215

Table 2.

Relative association and absolute similarity in weight status among the US married spouses, stratified by household/couple-level characteristics (MEPS 2006–2008).

N $ of spouses Absolute Relative associations
(1) Similarity (2) Pearson's correlation coefficients (3) Kappa coefficients between spouses weight status (4) ORs between wife's and husband's obesity status
Mean BMI BMI standard scores Normal/overweight/obesity Obesity
Husband Wife D £ Partial
r
95% CI k 95% CI OR 95% CI
Whole sample 11254 (100%) 27.9 26.3 1.6 0.24 (0.21, 0.27) 0.107 (0.107, 0.108) 2.5 (2.2, 2.9)
Stratified by
Couple's race/ethnicity
 Both NH white(ref) 5758 (69%) 28.0 26.0 1.9 0.26 (0.22, 0.30) 0.102 (0.101, 0.102) 2.8 (2.3, 3.4)
 Both NH black 1127 (7%) 29.0 29.2 −0.2 0.21 (0.14, 0.28) 0.059 (0.053, 0.066) 1.7 (1.2,2.3)
 Both Hispanic 2646 (12%) 28.3 27.8 0.4 0.20 (0.14, 0.26) 0.099 (0.096, 0.102) 2.3 (1.8, 2.8)
 Both were other 755 (5%) 25.4 23.5 1.9 0.29 (0.18, 0.41) 0.094 (0.085, 0.104) 3.4 (1.3, 9.1)
 Interracial/ethnic 968 (7%) 28.0 26.1 1.9 0.14 (0.06, 0.23) 0.089 (0.079, 0.098) 1.8 (1.2, 2.8)
Couple's mean age
 <30 y 1540 (13%) 27.6 25.6 1.9 0.27 (0.19, 0.35) 0.090 (0.085, 0.095) 3.0 (2.1, 4.4)
 30–39 y 3227 (26%) 28.1 26.3 1.8 0.28 (0.23, 0.34) 0.116 (0.114, 0.119) 2.9 (2.3, 3.7)
 40–54 y 4241 (39%) 28.2 26.5 1.7 0.21 (0.16, 0.27) 0.116 (0.115, 0.118) 2.4 (1.9, 3.1)
 ≥55 years 2246 (22%) 27.4 26.4 1.0 0.20 (0.14, 0.27) 0.081 (0.078, 0.084) 1.9 (1.3, 2.8)
Physical activity
 Both active 4629 (45%) 27.4 25.4 2.0 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) 0.102 (0.101, 0.103) 2.9 (2.4, 3.5)
 Only husband active 2025 (18%) 27.6 27.4 0.2 ∗∗∗ 0.23 (0.17, 0.29) 0.113 (0.108, 0.117) 2.8 (2.1, 3.8)
 Only wife active 1438 (14%) 28.5 25.8 2.7 ∗∗∗ 0.18 (0.10, 0.25) 0.052 (0.048, 0.056) 2.0 (1.4, 2.8)
 Both inactive(ref) 3092 (24%) 28.7 27.5 1.2 0.28 (0.22, 0.33) 0.128 (0.126, 0.130) 2.3 (1.8, 2.8)
Family size
 2 persons 3345 (34%) 27.5 25.8 1.7 0.20 (0.14, 0.26) 0.089 (0.087, 0.091) 2.1 (1.6, 2.8)
 3-4 persons 5162 (47%) 28.0 26.4 1.6 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) 0.109 (0.107, 0.110) 2.6 (2.1, 3.1)
 ≥5 persons(ref) 2747 (18%) 28.5 27.0 1.4 0.30 (0.23, 0.36) 0.130 (0.127, 0.132) 3.1 (2.3, 4.0)
Employment condition
 Both unemployed 873 (7%) 27.1 26.7 0.4 0.22 (0.11, 0.32) 0.075 (0.068, 0.083) 2.2 (1.4, 3.6)
 Only husband unemployed 625 (5%) 28.0 26.9 1.1 0.09 (−0.01, 0.20) ∗∗ 0.053 (0.042, 0.063) 1.3 (0.7, 2.3) ∗∗
 Only wife unemployed 2835 (22%) 27.7 26.3 1.4 0.23 (0.18, 0.29) 0.109 (0.107, 0.112) 2.4 (1.8, 3.1)
 Both employed(ref) 6899 (65%) 28.1 26.2 1.9 0.26 (0.22, 0.30) 0.115 (0.114, 0.116) 2.8 (2.3, 3.3)
Household income level
 Poor/near poor
 (<1.25 poverty line)
1611 (8%) 28.0 27.6 0.3 0.25 (0.18, 0.32) 0.107 (0.102, 0.112) 2.3 (1.8, 3.1)
 Low income
 (1.25–2.0 poverty line)
1564 (10%) 27.9 27.4 0.5 0.26 (0.18, 0.33) 0.092 (0.087, 0.097) 2.5 (1.8, 3.4)
 Middle income
 (2.0–4.0 poverty line)
3545 (32%) 28.2 27.0 1.2 0.25 (0.19, 0.30) 0.117 (0.115, 0.119) 2.6 (2.1, 3.2)
 High income
 (≥4.0 poverty line)
4534 (50%) 27.7 25.5 2.3 0.23 (0.19, 0.27) 0.102 (0.101, 0.104) 2.6 (2.1, 3.2)
Receiving food stamp last year
 Yes 705 (3%) 28.5 29.2 −0.6 ∗∗ 0.27 (0.17, 0.37) 0.162 (0.153, 0.171) 3.0 (2.0, 4.5)
 No(ref) 10549 (97%) 27.9 26.2 1.7 0.24 (0.21, 0.27) 0.105 (0.104, 0.105) 2.5 (2.2, 2.9)

Couple-level analysis: obesity: BMI ≥ 30; overweight: 30 > BMI ≥ 25.

$The sum of numbers among categories may not add up to 11254 due to missing data.

Testing for cross strata difference, compared to the referent stratum: ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001. (ref): the referent stratum.

£ D: difference in BMI = (husband's BMI − wife's BMI).

Adjusted for individual level variables, including husband's and wife's ages, education years, race/ethnicity, physical activity, smoking, individual income, employment status, survey year, indicator of respondent, and missingness indicators.