Table 2.
Regression coefficients of second-order polynomial model for the responses variable
| Coefficients a | DM (%) | Ln Fat | FFA (meq/100 g) | Salt (%) | Acidity (%w/w) lactic acid | Log (G′) | (Log (бf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β0 | 31.91 | −0.152 | 17.07 | 5.12 | 2.313 | 5.22 | 3.25 |
| linear | |||||||
| β 1 | −0.07 *** | −0.004 | 0.001 *** | 0.004 *** | – | −0.011 *** | −0.007 *** |
| β 2 | −0.02 * | −0.0009 * | 0.009 ** | 0.0066 | 0.0006* | −0.004 | – |
| β 3 | 0.7 | 3.257 *** | −11.61 ** | 2.243 ** | −1.885*** | 0.865 *** | −0.312 *** |
| interaction | |||||||
| β 12 | – | – | −6.4× 10−5** | – | – | – | – |
| β 13 | −0.01 * | 0.0013 ** | – | 0.0101 *** | – | – | – |
| β 23 | – | −0.0014 ** | −0.007 | −0.0074 *** | – | – | – |
| square | |||||||
| β 11 | 0.00014 * | 7.87× 10−6** | 6.55× 10−5** | −2.8× 10−5** | – | 2.73× 10−5*** | 1.39× 10−5*** |
| β 22 | 9.47× 10−5* | 5.67× 10−6* | – | – | – | 1.26× 10−5*** | – |
| β 33 | – | −1.296 *** | 6.038 ** | −1.761* | 1.227 *** | −0.771 ** | – |
| Adj-R2b | 0.953 | 0.974 | 0.846 | 0.908 | 0.8 | 0.972 | 0.958 |
| F | 57.925 | 86.286 | 14.357 | 26.272 | 19.00901 | 92.95 | 123.47 |
| P(F)c | p < 0.0001 | p < 0.0001 | p < 0.0002 | p < 0.0001 | p < 0.0001 | p < 0.0001 | p < 0.0001 |
| Lack of Fit | 0.20 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
alower scripts1, 2 and 3 indicate guar gum (ppm), gum arabic (ppm) and milk fat (%), respectively.
bAdj-R2 = adjusted R2.
cP (F) = probability of F.
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001