Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 7;51(10):2584–2591. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0768-y

Table 2.

Regression coefficients of second-order polynomial model for the responses variable

Coefficients a DM (%) Ln Fat FFA (meq/100 g) Salt (%) Acidity (%w/w) lactic acid Log (G′) (Log (бf
β0 31.91 −0.152 17.07 5.12 2.313 5.22 3.25
linear
β 1 −0.07 *** −0.004 0.001 *** 0.004 *** −0.011 *** −0.007 ***
β 2 −0.02 * −0.0009 * 0.009 ** 0.0066 0.0006* −0.004
β 3 0.7 3.257 *** −11.61 ** 2.243 ** −1.885*** 0.865 *** −0.312 ***
interaction
β 12 −6.4× 10−5**
β 13 −0.01 * 0.0013 ** 0.0101 ***
β 23 −0.0014 ** −0.007 −0.0074 ***
square
β 11 0.00014 * 7.87× 10−6** 6.55× 10−5** −2.8× 10−5** 2.73× 10−5*** 1.39× 10−5***
β 22 9.47× 10−5* 5.67× 10−6* 1.26× 10−5***
β 33 −1.296 *** 6.038 ** −1.761* 1.227 *** −0.771 **
Adj-R2b 0.953 0.974 0.846 0.908 0.8 0.972 0.958
F 57.925 86.286 14.357 26.272 19.00901 92.95 123.47
P(F)c p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0002 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001
Lack of Fit 0.20 0.51 0.55 0.62 0.13 0.25 0.50

alower scripts1, 2 and 3 indicate guar gum (ppm), gum arabic (ppm) and milk fat (%), respectively.

bAdj-R2 = adjusted R2.

cP (F) = probability of F.

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001